The march of the SS

No, not the one headed up by the nerdy little fascist guy in comedy specs with the terrible hairstyle, but the.......
Hang about having just looked at a picture of Michael Gove, I guess that I should specify clearly that I'm not referring to Mr Himmler when I speak of the SS, but the dreaded Social Services.

It appears that not agreeing with the local authority results in their "agency partnership policy" results in "information sharing", now to translate that into real English, they apparently have the right to ell their mates gossip, and if this gossip is on headed paper it somehow magickally becomes fact.

I guess that I should make it clear that the juvenile rhyme "Davis" was constructed in order to express my disdain at this practice. Now obviously the individual concerned shall remain nameless as making it clear who he is would be naughty, however as poetry is art and it appears that art is exempt from the law (you only have to look at Sir Elton's "art" collection to learn this) so no names will be mentioned in this post that will identify the unpleasant people responsible.

Being visited by a social worker is not a very nice experience and this becomes even more galling when they sit there and spout a load of old cobblers at you. What is more concerning is the manner in which anything on headed paper from their mates is recorded on record as fact, and any defence that you give in response is recorded as allegations, seems a little unfair to me. Especially when you present them with formal evidence that would convince a court, to which their reaction is akin to showing a vampire sunlight.

Upon request for the information passed to them by their mates, it's like you have just asked to see their bottom, and there is nothing forthcoming despite the DPA suggesting that there should be transparency, despite our MP thinking that this is a terrible thing.

Luckily they are a bit crap under pressure and a few quick well aimed questions usually disclose the majority of the "information" that they are acting upon. In this case it appears to be that I wrote on the interweb that I hope that the person making our lives a misery has a mishap that results in the loss of his penis. Apparently this has been suggested to them that I am somehow a danger to kids. Now despite the statement being less offensive than anything you would hear outside a school at kicking out time (not that I hang about outside schools I might add) it is apparently unacceptable even though the only exposure of it to any kids that I have seen, was when the social worker mentioned it.

The person responsible for this complaint has repeatedly used the local council to propagate his bile as he is mates with the local councillor and is aware that they are supportive of his attacks on myself and my family, and the council are only to happy to oblige by passing this to their mates.

And yes, I hope that his wanger does drop off, I think that wishing him misfortune is acceptable considering that the idiot has been photographing kids outside his window for the last 3 years and reporting anyone who dares to even fart too close to his flat. He has arranged for a CCTV camera to monitor the other residents of the block for months claiming that there was some kind of serious criminal activity occurring, however it has only proven that the only place that this happens is inside his empty little head full of hate.

Some of his past successes are having a bicycle taken away because it wasn't securely locked enough so that he could move it to cause an obstruction, photograph it and report it to his mate at the council. He has also photographed myself and my stepson putting binbags in the bin and reported it as flytipping, and as insane as this sounds, we were presented with a bill for 50 quid by the stupid town hall idiots. His biggest achievement was the CCTV camera, and the following statement that instead of being a fruitless exercise in wasting public funds, it did in fact prevent a serious crime from occurring, I guess this is in the same vein as my magick hat that keeps dragons away, and as I have seen no dragons since wearing it, it clearly works. (If you want to buy one of my magick hats they are very reasonably priced, just let me know your size and send a postal order for 500 quid).

So far from protecting kids, the SS appear to be intent on persecuting them on behalf of the bloke that I obviously won't name, who has made his life a misery for the last three years. But hey, they have to take these reports seriously. Well, except when we report anything, like potential paedophile activity on their property, then they inform the person concerned to remove the offending evidence rather than reporting it to their buddies.

 I guess that they are only there to address issues relating to us "plebs" and as we can see those in positions of power are untouchable, if only there was some way we could make our kids just as "untouchable" to them.  They do say that you can judge a person by the company they keep, and the world of social workers seem to like our MP, who has chosen to keep to himself that his father worked for the Diocese of Chichester under the former bishop of lewes, and a quick google of "bishop of lewes" will show you what kind of fella he is alleged to be. If you lie down with dogs.......

Nuff said

HHH