Yesterday in Parliament Tim Loughton was raging about me being a "serial complainer" and that complaints made by myself were numerous and therefore "vexatious", this apparently gave him the right to swear at me and be very insulting about my appearance.
I watch, with great amusement, the spiralling contradictions that seem to be unfurling in Loughton Land. So far, in the last fortnight, he has complained to his friends at the Daily Mail, after that, he went to the Chief Constable of Sussex Police, when he got no joy there, he went to the Police and Crime Commissioner (his mate Kate), we didn't get to hear the outcome of that one though, he then went to Parliament and stood in front of some sleeping MPs and complained about it on tele to the nation. He followed that up with some radio interviews and a couple more tabloids for good measure.
He now claims that he is going to make an official complaint to Sussex Police. According to his meter he is now clearly a vexatious serial complainer, and so Sussex Police should by rights follow his example and simply issue the official response, "Piss off smelly pants".
K
Thursday, 14 March 2013
Timmys little Parliamentary tantrum.
Well, have to say that it's pretty impressive to have a bunch of Tory scum talk complete crap about me for about half an hour, more impressive than that, is the way in which not one single truth was told throughout the entire tedious monologue debate.
I have to say, I haven't heard such petty minded venom since I was in a room full of drag queens vying for top billing. Apparently Loughton was afforded special dispensation to say the word "bollocks" on Parliament, and proceeded to use is as many times as possible like a precocious five year old.
Pretty much everything he said was completely untrue, from his claims that any complaint that I have made have all been deemed to be false, when in reality they are only ignored until they progress beyond the local Tory held boundaries, to the claim that I swore at a pregnant female secretary and made her cry. I heard a rumour that Loughton cried at a swearing female secretary and made her pregnant, but that's another story, a made up one, like his.
As for him being an arrogant lying racist arsehead, I see no evidence to the contrary, and as for me calling him an "effing Nazi" I didn't, but hey, if the schirmmutze fits.....
I do like his "more chips on his shoulder than McCains", I haven't heard that one since the 1980s Loughton's clothes were fashionable, Well better that than more skeletons in the closet than the Natural History Museum.
Aside from telling someone that I hope their nob falls off which clearly is a major cause of mental illness, I am supposed to have attended far-left rallies in Czech, which is wrong how exactly? and have displayed pictures with my "prized collection of over 300 edged weapons" not sure where that number came from, I've never counted but I'm pretty sure that I come way short of 300 historical artifacts of warfare from the late bronze age to the 1960s, some of which are very rare indeed and all are legally held and securely stored. He claims to be an archaeologist but seems to think that my collection should somehow be judged to be unacceptable in some way or other.
And as for my dinner party with Adolf Hitler and Pol Pot, he forgot to ask what was on the menu (evil villain laughter), Loughton is welcome to attend as well if he fancies, I'll hold a chair by for him if he likes.
Anyway, there is so much crap to correct in his stupid debate, I'll have to continue later........
Until then
K
I have to say, I haven't heard such petty minded venom since I was in a room full of drag queens vying for top billing. Apparently Loughton was afforded special dispensation to say the word "bollocks" on Parliament, and proceeded to use is as many times as possible like a precocious five year old.
Pretty much everything he said was completely untrue, from his claims that any complaint that I have made have all been deemed to be false, when in reality they are only ignored until they progress beyond the local Tory held boundaries, to the claim that I swore at a pregnant female secretary and made her cry. I heard a rumour that Loughton cried at a swearing female secretary and made her pregnant, but that's another story, a made up one, like his.
As for him being an arrogant lying racist arsehead, I see no evidence to the contrary, and as for me calling him an "effing Nazi" I didn't, but hey, if the schirmmutze fits.....
Aside from telling someone that I hope their nob falls off which clearly is a major cause of mental illness, I am supposed to have attended far-left rallies in Czech, which is wrong how exactly? and have displayed pictures with my "prized collection of over 300 edged weapons" not sure where that number came from, I've never counted but I'm pretty sure that I come way short of 300 historical artifacts of warfare from the late bronze age to the 1960s, some of which are very rare indeed and all are legally held and securely stored. He claims to be an archaeologist but seems to think that my collection should somehow be judged to be unacceptable in some way or other.
And as for my dinner party with Adolf Hitler and Pol Pot, he forgot to ask what was on the menu (evil villain laughter), Loughton is welcome to attend as well if he fancies, I'll hold a chair by for him if he likes.
Anyway, there is so much crap to correct in his stupid debate, I'll have to continue later........
Until then
K
Update
Well, according to Loughton's farcical rant in Parliament yesterday, it appears that he is claiming that Kevin Davis was now "suffering mental health problems" because I apparently said that it would be funny if his knob dropped off. Really?
I understand mental health conditions somewhat, and I have seen no evidence that telling someone that their penis should fall off, could in any way be the cause of any recognised mental health condition. If Mr Loughton knows otherwise, then I'm sure that the NIMH would love to see his evidence.
But Parliamentary privilege means that he needs no evidence, he needs no facts of any kind, he doesn't even need to be telling the truth, he can just stand up and spew whatever "bollocks" he chooses to.
Hurrah for democracy.
I will answer all of his lies later when I have more time available.
K
I understand mental health conditions somewhat, and I have seen no evidence that telling someone that their penis should fall off, could in any way be the cause of any recognised mental health condition. If Mr Loughton knows otherwise, then I'm sure that the NIMH would love to see his evidence.
But Parliamentary privilege means that he needs no evidence, he needs no facts of any kind, he doesn't even need to be telling the truth, he can just stand up and spew whatever "bollocks" he chooses to.
Hurrah for democracy.
I will answer all of his lies later when I have more time available.
K
Saturday, 9 March 2013
Open letter to idiots who believe the lies printed in the Daily Scum.
Malicious communications is not, and can never be construed as "racism". The fact that Tim Loughton himself provided the entirety of this "story" himself, just shows that this cannot be trusted. People who claim to not want to be controlled taking a story concocted by a Tory and publicised by the mail, realy should take a good look at themselves.
The fact is that after 2 years of abuse from the local tory council, I wrote a polite email to my MP and received a tirade of abuse and swearing in reply. Who should I ask for help when I have no rights? I asked the police, who knew that what was going on was wrong, they questioned him under the Malicious communications act, which can not be racially motivated, as a traveller I was also offended at the abusive rhetoric distributed by all of our local tories, all freely available on loughton's website, and believed that the abuse from the local council was as a result of myself expressing that I felt that claims that we need to "fortify Adur against traveller incursions" were unacceptable, which they are.
Following my raising of these issues, a council inspection was carried out on my family's allotment when we were not present, claimed that we had been using human faeces on our compost heap, this DID NOT happen, no environmental investigation was carried out and our allotment levelled and everything taken away by the council before we had any chance to prove that their claims were lies.
I was then attacked by the council's allotment manager, in an unprovoked assault, whilst shopping and when the store reported this to the police, he was arrested. The council did not like this and the abuse stepped up.
Myself and my family have never used offensive language towards local councillors or Loughton, but Loughton decided to send a very offensive response which included swear words, which is clearly an unacceptable response from parliament to a question asked politely.
Following this investigation, Loughton has claimed victim status and exploited his position to distribute a very twisted version of events through the media, and has also further abused his position to gain contact with the chief Constable, and the commissioner, who he chose for the candidacy in the first place in order to halt the investigation.
The reason that this investigation took so long was because he chose to involve senior officers to look at why he was questioned for being supportive of a 2 year hate campaign against an innocent family, and the police decided that his sweary and insulting email sent in response to a polite request for justice was malicious, which it clearly was. that's malicious, not racist, however the fact that he chooses to be outraged by being accused of being racist clearly shows that he has issues regarding this angle of his "narcissistic" personality.
It also turns out that his response, as well as rude and offensive, was also wrong, as the ICO decided that the council HAD breached the DPA.
If you believe the lies that you read in the Mail then you are just as stupid as the people who vote for the likes of Loughton, and I hope that one day, you write to your elected representative in Parliament and receive no answers to your question but a tirade of sweary abuse. Then you'll know what it's like, and then I will accept your views.
If you know nothing, say nothing.
Kieran
The fact is that after 2 years of abuse from the local tory council, I wrote a polite email to my MP and received a tirade of abuse and swearing in reply. Who should I ask for help when I have no rights? I asked the police, who knew that what was going on was wrong, they questioned him under the Malicious communications act, which can not be racially motivated, as a traveller I was also offended at the abusive rhetoric distributed by all of our local tories, all freely available on loughton's website, and believed that the abuse from the local council was as a result of myself expressing that I felt that claims that we need to "fortify Adur against traveller incursions" were unacceptable, which they are.
Following my raising of these issues, a council inspection was carried out on my family's allotment when we were not present, claimed that we had been using human faeces on our compost heap, this DID NOT happen, no environmental investigation was carried out and our allotment levelled and everything taken away by the council before we had any chance to prove that their claims were lies.
I was then attacked by the council's allotment manager, in an unprovoked assault, whilst shopping and when the store reported this to the police, he was arrested. The council did not like this and the abuse stepped up.
Myself and my family have never used offensive language towards local councillors or Loughton, but Loughton decided to send a very offensive response which included swear words, which is clearly an unacceptable response from parliament to a question asked politely.
Following this investigation, Loughton has claimed victim status and exploited his position to distribute a very twisted version of events through the media, and has also further abused his position to gain contact with the chief Constable, and the commissioner, who he chose for the candidacy in the first place in order to halt the investigation.
The reason that this investigation took so long was because he chose to involve senior officers to look at why he was questioned for being supportive of a 2 year hate campaign against an innocent family, and the police decided that his sweary and insulting email sent in response to a polite request for justice was malicious, which it clearly was. that's malicious, not racist, however the fact that he chooses to be outraged by being accused of being racist clearly shows that he has issues regarding this angle of his "narcissistic" personality.
It also turns out that his response, as well as rude and offensive, was also wrong, as the ICO decided that the council HAD breached the DPA.
If you believe the lies that you read in the Mail then you are just as stupid as the people who vote for the likes of Loughton, and I hope that one day, you write to your elected representative in Parliament and receive no answers to your question but a tirade of sweary abuse. Then you'll know what it's like, and then I will accept your views.
If you know nothing, say nothing.
Kieran
Friday, 8 March 2013
If you enjoyed "Tea with Mussolini"
You're gonna love "Lunch with Loughton"
Who on earth would want their meal interrupted with fascist propaganda?
Anybody fancy a "Finger Buffet with Franco"?
Anybody fancy a "Finger Buffet with Franco"?
Local rag or tabloid slag?
Well, the Herald has done it's best to misrepresent the truth in order to support it's bread and butter story whore, Tim Loughton again. If they're ever stuck for something to fill the paper when there's no real news they go to The Lought and he can appear in a lovely story that he made up specially for them. This week is no different.
It should say "for full story, go somewhere else, we're only interested in supporting the Tory junta"
Where do we begin with this one? Well, I tried to ask the hack responsible for this rubbish but was told that he would make no comment and to await a call from his editor, some bloke called Colin something or other, I can't say I took much notice. The call came, and I was informed that this story had come directly from and was intended to reflect the thoughts and feelings of, Tim Loughton. It appears that the truth wasn't the driving force here, but self publicity from Timmy Tim. He also claimed that the language used by Lought was similar to the language in the email that I sent him.
I asked if he had seen the correspondence that I sent, but he claimed that seeing a screen capture of it on here was not reliable, but claimed that as the MP had said that it was offensive, he had no reason to doubt it. So the truth is clearly the same as the other press coverage, by that I mean, Loughton contacted the press claiming that he had been investigated for a whole 90 minutes for saying "unkempt", but it was OK because he said it to someone who sent him an offensive email, he forgot to provide the actual emails in question, but could obviously be relied on to tell the truth. You'd think that journo's had never met MPs before.
They really don't want to tell the truth do they? A balanced view of the story was researched by simply taking a call from Loughton, listening to his "poisonous bollocks" and then printing it, in all of it's misrepresented glory.
But it's OK, there's plenty of gullible idiot loughton supporters out there who are happy to believe that just because it has been alleged in a tabloid that it somehow passes into fact, despite not being even remotely true, apart from in their stereotypical bigoted world, most of them are not fit to be breathing the same air as the rest of us, like this waste of skin:
Where do we begin with this one? Well, I tried to ask the hack responsible for this rubbish but was told that he would make no comment and to await a call from his editor, some bloke called Colin something or other, I can't say I took much notice. The call came, and I was informed that this story had come directly from and was intended to reflect the thoughts and feelings of, Tim Loughton. It appears that the truth wasn't the driving force here, but self publicity from Timmy Tim. He also claimed that the language used by Lought was similar to the language in the email that I sent him.
I asked if he had seen the correspondence that I sent, but he claimed that seeing a screen capture of it on here was not reliable, but claimed that as the MP had said that it was offensive, he had no reason to doubt it. So the truth is clearly the same as the other press coverage, by that I mean, Loughton contacted the press claiming that he had been investigated for a whole 90 minutes for saying "unkempt", but it was OK because he said it to someone who sent him an offensive email, he forgot to provide the actual emails in question, but could obviously be relied on to tell the truth. You'd think that journo's had never met MPs before.
They really don't want to tell the truth do they? A balanced view of the story was researched by simply taking a call from Loughton, listening to his "poisonous bollocks" and then printing it, in all of it's misrepresented glory.
But it's OK, there's plenty of gullible idiot loughton supporters out there who are happy to believe that just because it has been alleged in a tabloid that it somehow passes into fact, despite not being even remotely true, apart from in their stereotypical bigoted world, most of them are not fit to be breathing the same air as the rest of us, like this waste of skin:
I wonder if she'd like to know what I'd like to call her?
Thursday, 7 March 2013
Want to see some more Loughton Correspondence?
Well, you're going to anyway.
The year before last my then 11 year old stepson wrote to Loughton about the council taking his allotment from him. He was as polite and courteous in his letter, however when he received a response from a secretary, he asked if he could get a response from the then children's minister and not one of his "underlings".
Now we are talking about a kid here, his use of the word "underling" did not have the connotations attached that an adult would perceive, but simply an 11 year old, trying out some new bigger words.
He received this in response:
I
Loughton was then asked why he hadn't answered the question and if he was children's minister why was he ignoring a child, especially one with disabilities? I obviously don't want to distribute kids letters with personal thoughts included.
The year before last my then 11 year old stepson wrote to Loughton about the council taking his allotment from him. He was as polite and courteous in his letter, however when he received a response from a secretary, he asked if he could get a response from the then children's minister and not one of his "underlings".
Now we are talking about a kid here, his use of the word "underling" did not have the connotations attached that an adult would perceive, but simply an 11 year old, trying out some new bigger words.
He received this in response:
I
I have redacted anything that would identify the child concerned.
Loughton was then asked why he hadn't answered the question and if he was children's minister why was he ignoring a child, especially one with disabilities? I obviously don't want to distribute kids letters with personal thoughts included.
When I returned home and was shown these responses to a child from the childrens minister I was obviously a little unhappy to say the least.
So I called Loughton's office and asked if I could speak to him, I was told that I would receive a call back, this never happened, so I called again, and was told that I would not be receiving a response to any of the questions asked and when I asked if I could make an appointment at the next surgery, I was told that I wasn't allowed. That's democracy for you, apparently I upset his staff the last time I attended his surgery, even though there were no staff there, and I hadn't attended a surgery for more than 5 years, and on that one and only occasion I simply walked out while he was speaking as I had become bored with his standard non committal answers and sidestepping, I said very little, anyone who has met Loughton will know full well that you actually get to say hardly a word and he goes off on what appears to be a well rehearsed standard answer. In both situations I said no naughty words, and even pretended to respect his authoritaaah.
So I wrote to him expressing that I did not appreciate him reprimanding me to my stepson and involving a child in what appeared to be his dislike for me. I wrote this:
Now you can see all the rude words that he claims that I use, and that he was merely responding in the manner that I communicate with him, I didn't say bollocks even once. As there was a reporter interested in the allotment story from the eyes of a child, I copied them in on my email, this is the response.
Now a lot of this came as a bit of a surprise to me, considering that I was in a different town when the email was sent by the youngling. The self righteous idiot decides to claim that our parenting style is unacceptable, and worse than that would not accept that an 11 year old could possibly think for himself, and decide to write to his MP who just happened to be the minister for children and supporter of childrens charities and the Heart Foundation.
I have no ideas what he is imagining happening when I spoke to him or his staff, but judging by the clear hatred he harbours, if I had actually done any of these things, he would not have hesitated try and have me arrested for some kind of public order offence. The fact that these things did not happen doesn't seem to worry Little Timbo, he'll rant on about them anyway.
What is absolutely hilarious, is his claim that he does not enter into correspondence through the media, when he was pretty quick in getting on to the Tory filth rags to misrepresent the facts in order to portray myself as the offensive communicator and him as the victim.
Now you can see the last 7 years or so correspondence between myself and Loughton in full, yes that's it, there is no more. You can now make judgement on who exactly should be viewed as the aggressive emailer. I accept that my emails were quite firm and clearly not the work of a happy bunny, but to claim that his email in some way mimicked my style of writing is more offensive than his email itself, not to mention complete "bollocks" to use the kind of language favoured by Tim Loughton.
Have fun y'all
Kieran
Wednesday, 6 March 2013
He was quoting me apparently.
As we all know from the ever honest Daily Mail, Tim Loughton claims that the abusive language that he wrote to myself, was merely the language that I had used toward him.
This is his justification for swearing, making very abusive statements and generally behaving like a spoilt five year old. Now strangely both he, and the media forgot to include the email that supposedly gave him the divine right to "retaliate".
Would you like to see this obscene, abusive, and whatever other sensationalist adjective that these idiots choose to attach, document in all it's evil, unpleasant glory?
No? Well you're gonna see it anyway, I apologise if it ruins your belief in the faultless media and honest politicians who act with integrity.
I hope that you can now see exactly the abusive nature of this correspondence, whichhe claims clearly warranted his childish outburst in response, and why he claims that his tantrums following his questioning by the police for supposedly using the same "offensive vernacular" as this email, were completely justified.
So bear in mind that the defence that he offered was that he was responding to me in the manner that I communicated with him and so it was not offensive in any way, now that you've seen it in it's full unedited glory, you can decide whether you would accept a sweary insulting response without challenge.
Bear in mind that this blog, which is offensive to Loughton and his supporters intentionally, was not in operation when he wrote to me, when you judge me as the problem and not Loughton and his distribution of disinformation in order to claim innocence. Makes you wonder why he waited until he got the charges dropped before he went public with his disgust. He clearly knew that he was in the wrong and that he should be found guilty, but wanted to ensure his "innocence" before being mortally offended by the investigation.
He was sacked as "minister for middle classed, anglo-saxon children" the week after Parliament were made aware of the investigation and provided with a copy of my email to him and his clearly offensive response. I wouldn't dream of connecting the two facts myself, but you can decide whether this was merely a coincidence.
Forget about the bogey man, the right wing fascist rags are out there.
Kieran
This is his justification for swearing, making very abusive statements and generally behaving like a spoilt five year old. Now strangely both he, and the media forgot to include the email that supposedly gave him the divine right to "retaliate".
Would you like to see this obscene, abusive, and whatever other sensationalist adjective that these idiots choose to attach, document in all it's evil, unpleasant glory?
No? Well you're gonna see it anyway, I apologise if it ruins your belief in the faultless media and honest politicians who act with integrity.
You may need to click and save and zoom or some other magic computer trickery in order to read it clearly.
I hope that you can now see exactly the abusive nature of this correspondence, whichhe claims clearly warranted his childish outburst in response, and why he claims that his tantrums following his questioning by the police for supposedly using the same "offensive vernacular" as this email, were completely justified.
So bear in mind that the defence that he offered was that he was responding to me in the manner that I communicated with him and so it was not offensive in any way, now that you've seen it in it's full unedited glory, you can decide whether you would accept a sweary insulting response without challenge.
Bear in mind that this blog, which is offensive to Loughton and his supporters intentionally, was not in operation when he wrote to me, when you judge me as the problem and not Loughton and his distribution of disinformation in order to claim innocence. Makes you wonder why he waited until he got the charges dropped before he went public with his disgust. He clearly knew that he was in the wrong and that he should be found guilty, but wanted to ensure his "innocence" before being mortally offended by the investigation.
He was sacked as "minister for middle classed, anglo-saxon children" the week after Parliament were made aware of the investigation and provided with a copy of my email to him and his clearly offensive response. I wouldn't dream of connecting the two facts myself, but you can decide whether this was merely a coincidence.
Forget about the bogey man, the right wing fascist rags are out there.
Kieran
Tuesday, 5 March 2013
Spot The Difference.
Here's a little puzzle for you. See if you can spot all the differences between these two almost identical photos.
Did you spot the difference?
Scroll down for the answer........
The one at the bottom has yellow spots on his tie, otherwise I'm pretty sure that they're identical.
Richard Littlejohn
is entitled to his views apparently, no matter how disgusting they are or how offensive he chooses to be. His legal advisor makes this perfectly clear.Well as he has made a living being an arse for quite a while one should only expect to be offended by his pathetic, childish, fascistic views.
Views fully supported by the filthy rag that buys his jackboots for him. Who claim that he is entitled to be as abusive as he likes in order to support Tory filth like Loughton.
I really shouldn't be surprised that I am offended by this feeble excuse for a human being, after all, he stands for everything putrid in this country, but when these bastards write stuff about you personally that you know is flawed in every way and is based on nothing more than preconceived discriminatory views held by morons and enjoyed by cretins, it does get to you a bit.
I now know all about Littledick now, it's on the internet so it must be true:
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Richard_Littlejohn
Kieran
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)