Where do we begin with this one? Well, I tried to ask the hack responsible for this rubbish but was told that he would make no comment and to await a call from his editor, some bloke called Colin something or other, I can't say I took much notice. The call came, and I was informed that this story had come directly from and was intended to reflect the thoughts and feelings of, Tim Loughton. It appears that the truth wasn't the driving force here, but self publicity from Timmy Tim. He also claimed that the language used by Lought was similar to the language in the email that I sent him.
I asked if he had seen the correspondence that I sent, but he claimed that seeing a screen capture of it on here was not reliable, but claimed that as the MP had said that it was offensive, he had no reason to doubt it. So the truth is clearly the same as the other press coverage, by that I mean, Loughton contacted the press claiming that he had been investigated for a whole 90 minutes for saying "unkempt", but it was OK because he said it to someone who sent him an offensive email, he forgot to provide the actual emails in question, but could obviously be relied on to tell the truth. You'd think that journo's had never met MPs before.
They really don't want to tell the truth do they? A balanced view of the story was researched by simply taking a call from Loughton, listening to his "poisonous bollocks" and then printing it, in all of it's misrepresented glory.
But it's OK, there's plenty of gullible idiot loughton supporters out there who are happy to believe that just because it has been alleged in a tabloid that it somehow passes into fact, despite not being even remotely true, apart from in their stereotypical bigoted world, most of them are not fit to be breathing the same air as the rest of us, like this waste of skin:
I wonder if she'd like to know what I'd like to call her?
