Would the (dis)honourable gentleman please give his arse a chance.

Another day, another dollop. Yes, looks like Loughton is really getting into recycling, how many times are we going to hear the same lines time and again? I hope that his speech/press release writer in on a fixed fee, because if they're on royalties the public purse is going to run dry soon.

This time on Cunservative Home:

 

 

 

 

"Tearing into Catholic Bishops"?, that sounds like fun, must try it sometime.
Anyway it appears that Timmy is proudly declaring a selection of things that he claims that he is not, this is becoming a bit of a habit. I'm not sure, but I fail to see the (obvious only in Timmy Tory World) "flaw" in the logic that if you do not believe in equal rights for gay couples then you are are against equal rights for gay couples. Tim's voting record doesn't look to favourable to equal rights either, despite his claims that he supported the idea to give gay couples a "wedding light" type ceremony.

Claiming that "gay marriage" is the "new black" could quite easily get misquoted, especially as a statement from a tory, but obviously I wouldn't dare do that on here, that's far to cheap a shot, I'll leave those to Timmy.

The basic principle of a "yes or no" vote does actually mean that if you are not for, then you are against, you can dress it up, but rhetoric cannot dress up a "one or zero" outcome. Parliamentary voting is not on a "Strongly agree - Strongly disagree" sliding scale, they are on a simple yes or no basis, probably so that MPs like Loughton don't get all confusticated.

When he started on about the "most insidious and destructive forces at work in society today" I thought he meant the Tory party, silly me, he obviously meant all of those naughty pieces of, equalities and diversity legislation, that catch out, and clearly identify bigots from time to time.

Well, here we go, get out your violins 'cos Tim's recycling parts of his fantastic rant about how unfair it was that he was subjected to a whole 90 minutes of tricky questions when he thought that they'd invited him to the police station for milk and cookies. Lucky that he didn't follow his usual procedure and ensure that he had a couple of reporters on hand to document his fantastic and exciting MP type lifestyle. That could have been embarrassing now couldn't it?

Cue the good old well rehearsed lines claiming that was all there was to the investigation and it all seems like everyone's picking on poor Timmy Boy, despite the matter being somewhat more than the simple one word racism lies put forward by him. Yes he had no idea, if he actually listened when people spoke to him he would have clearly heard it, but like all Tory narcissists, he has a selected deafness towards anything other than praise, so he must have missed it. With regard to the not being "required to prove it" part, I get images of horrendous 70's style "comedies" where a policeman asks the nice afro-caribbean chappie if he is able to actually prove that he is black, I thought that those days were over but it seems that I may have been wrong. Well as Loughton seems quite at home with the whole "are you being served" world of comedy, considering his likening of the DfE to it, maybe he thinks that all gay men are just like John Inman and I bet he still laughs at those pathetic "pussy" jokes.

He then goes on to make up some silly "urban myth" style examples of "PC gone mad, I tell ya", I wonder if the "completely fictitious, arrest of witches manual" suggests that putting handcuffs on a witch is like hand fasting and the officer could end up trapped in a "satanic" marriage without knowing it, the nonsensical rantings of the Tory insane PC posse get better every time. Crap, crappity, crap, crap, pretty much sums up what I think of your silly examples of political correctness.

Apparently it's all down to free speech according to Timmy Pants, funny how when he accused me (falsely I might add) of calling him a F*cking Nazi, he wasn't out there fighting for the rights of members of the public to express their freedom of speech by calling their MPs F*cking Nazis if they fancy. I'm sorry to disappoint you but I did not call him this, or most of the other things that he claims I did, well not in his presence anyway, I will have take the fifth on whether I have referred to him by any of these terms in private conversations since though.

Oh and that "joke" at the end wasn't funny the other dozen or so times, so sorry Timmy, looks like you can go on your crusade alone, don't forget your packed lunch and bottle of ginger beer now, and be home by tea time, it's your favourite tonight, pauper's head on a silver platter.

K