I opened my fridge, and who did I find lurking inside, only Tim "vegetable head" Loughton, that's who.
I'm planning on skinning, dicing, boiling and mashing him later. Looking forward to it as well.
Saturday, 12 October 2013
Bloody stalkers!
They're everywhere I tell ya.
I opened my fridge, and who did I find lurking inside, only Tim "vegetable head" Loughton, that's who.
I'm planning on skinning, dicing, boiling and mashing him later. Looking forward to it as well.
I opened my fridge, and who did I find lurking inside, only Tim "vegetable head" Loughton, that's who.
I'm planning on skinning, dicing, boiling and mashing him later. Looking forward to it as well.
Friday, 11 October 2013
Shoreham Herald, or as it's known locally, The Tim(e)s
Well, it appears that yet again the Harald (you must shout this in a Steptoe manner) has decided to demonstrate it's independence by printing yet another story which splashes my name across it's pages but neglects to even bother to ask for a statement, they'd rather just promote the local Tories blindly.
The right to be consulted before being named in the press is a matter of journalistic integrity, but as the Harald has none of this, they simply pretend that they are able to print any old crap they fancy, without and right to reply from the person repeatedly named within their filthy pages.
Lets break it down.....
Former human being Tim Loughton has unleashed yet another unsubstantiated tantrum, riddled with the usual vitriolic "bollocks".
Let's do some correction as Oli Poole is too much of a coward to answer his phone to receive an honest interview with the person he has chosen to slander. My words in red this time.
The Conservative MP previously told the Commons that the police spent six months investigating him for alleged racist abuse after describing ''nightmare constituent" Kieran Francis as ''unkempt''.
Which is complete and utter crap, I'm getting rather fed up of pointing out the clear facts of this matter, there was no "racist" investigation, look at the law books, malicious communications can not be racially motivated, and as such cannot be an investigation into "racism". However after this investigation Loughton did say this:
Mr Loughton, MP for East Worthing and Shoreham, said his constituent stepped up an "onslaught of vile abuse", mainly against him, including doctoring photographs of his children taken from social media sites plus urging him to commit suicide, after he raised the issue during a Commons debate in March.
Right, so the death threats sent to myself and my family weren't "vile abuse", even when they were opened by a kid on Xmas eve? As for "doctoring photographs of his children taken from" his twitter account, here it is. Is this worse than Loughton and his mates cornering my aspergers stepson in the street and intimidating him after I told him to step away while the local Tories were attacking me, personally I think that posting a silly picture of his horsey faced brats, Eyore and Dobbin, is far less abusive. He chose to bring families into play, if mine are his target, then fair's fair.
As for "urging him to commit suicide", another sensationalist claim, I'm not sure exactly how one would go about trying to encourage someone's suicide, I guess that I would publicly humiliate them with lies, delivered in a forum which could not be challenged, oh no, hang on, that's what this b*stard has been doing to me, what did I do? Well, I did this.....
As you can see, it's incredibly sinister.
During this debate t he one-time education minister said he was " sacking Mr Francis as my constituent", adding that his staff had been instructed to put the phone down on him.
Mr Loughton said he planned to inform Mr Francis of this information in a letter but instead sent a complete Hansard record which included the March 13 debate .
The "sacking", yet another load of old cobblers. You see, when a statement is made in Parliament, it is recorded verbatim in the Hansard. This does not give the statement any power or legal strength, Loughton could have said anything, like sheep can fly, or that he was a really good minister, it doesn't make the statements any less incorrect just by saying them in the Hoc. The official response from Parliament regarding this sacking is this...
I wonder if "sacking" me made Timmy feel a bit like David Camoron, and all important and able to sack people who displease him. Meanwhile, in the real world, Loughton isn't an important politician like a prime minister, or even a junior minister, he's just civil servant with an expense account and delusions of grandeur.
He could have sent me it in a singing telegram, or tattooed on an elephant's scrotum, it wouldn't have made it any more factual. You can see from the official notification from Parliament which was sent to me last month, sadly I still have an incompetent MP who thinks that he can say something and it immediately becomes gospel. Loughton is an MP not a demigod, no matter how much he tries to kid himself.
But the MP said on Wednesday that this action, which he took following advice from a Parliament clerk and believed would be covered by parliamentary privilege, resulted in him receiving a police information notice (Pin) from Sussex Police.
The Pin warned that this action had caused " alarm and distress" to the ex-constituent and warned he would be liable to arrest and prosecution if that kind of behaviour continued, according to Mr Loughton.
Again he claims that the notice only mentions one incident, when any journalist worth their salt would have asked to see a copy of this PIN in order to judge for themselves whether he is being truthful. I asked to be allowed to see the other PINs, and was told that this would only happen if all parties agreed, I made it clear that I had no problem with transparency, as I have nothing to hide, but someone else refused to allow this transparency, I wonder why. As far as I understand, there was far more than one incident listed on the PIN given to Loughton, but until he shows his hand everyone will just have to believe his very public bluff. Well, Timmy I call!
The Tory told the Commons he believed Sussex Police's actions represented a "clear breach" of parliamentary privilege, which grants certain legal immunities for members to allow them to perform their duties without interference from outside the House.
It is not there to allow an MP to air their personal grievances in a very public forum and expect to be protected by some outdated legal vacuum. What duty was he performing here, he definitely doesn't represent his constituents (of which I am one) with this vigour, in fact I don't recall when he has ever directly raised the concerns of any of his constituents in the HoC in the many years that he has been paid to do this.
Mr Loughton said: "If this goes unchecked, any constituent with a grudge against his or her member of Parliament could claim harassment.
Anyone being personally attacked by another should have the right to challenge that person, be they prince, pope or plumber. Sadly this is not a reciprocal arrangement because clearly any Member of Parliament with a grudge against a constituent can claim harassment, and then when it is revealed that the constituent concerned has not broken any laws they have the right to have a public platform from which to launch a retaliatory tantrum which is far more vile than anything that was ever said to them.
"Any MP exposing any dodgy organisation in Parliament could find themselves being questioned by the police and... being given advice as to how to do our job.
What about MPs REPRESENTING dodgy organisations, can they be questioned by the police, because I have a few potential candidates. Maybe if Loughton was capable of doing his job, people wouldn't need to tell him how to do it, he should be grateful for the helpful hints, I assume it was along the lines of ,"when an MP writes to a member of the public, it is probably best if you don't call them names and swear at them, because that isn't very nice. If people do this to you, you expect them to be arrested, if you do it, you should expect the same. Your job title isn't an exemption from the law you know Tim".
"Indeed, Abu Hamza may well have a case against (Home Secretary Theresa May) for being rightly beastly about him in Parliament and find herself on the receiving end of a police information notice."
Mr Loughton's motion for the Pin to be referred to the Committee of Privileges was passed unopposed in the Commons.
Yes Tim, I'm just like Abu Hamza aren't I? A reported terrorist and preacher of hate. Say that again and I'll tell everyone that in your spare time, you like to dress as a middle aged woman and pretend to be a powerful important person like Teresa May rather than the saggy old sacked minister that you really are. You never know, I might decide not to do that and instead reveal some other dirty secret of yours that is actually true.
Moving the motion, Mr Loughton said he had no communication with his ex-constituent since sending the Hansard record while he claimed Mr Francis had "stepped up an onslaught of vile abuse", which included targeting the leader and chairman of Adur District Council, among others.
Mr Loughton said: "Yesterday he (Mr Francis) was abusing the organisers of Worthing Mental Health Awareness Week, which I have launched, and to date he has posted on his blog or sent tweets to or about me and my council colleagues on well over 200 occasions.
Only 200, that's nothing compared to the thousands of hate filled emails and social media attacks that I received from his extremist pals after his last tirade of lies and abuse, in both Parliament and his direct contact with his mates at the Daily Mail.
"Many come under the heading of political abuse which, however offensive that is, we all know it is part of our job.
"However, what is not part of that job is they have included doctored photographs of my children taken from their social media sites - what a man in his 40s is doing trawling the social media sites of teenage girls I do not know.
Oh, after the terrorist insinuation, we now have a paedophile suggestion, Loughton is really a filthy minded little man isn't he. You would think that someone who is consistently trying to surround themselves with youngsters despite not being a children's minister any more would attract some tricky questions.
Look who's hanging around in a school playground trying to impress the schoolgirls with his ability to dry hump a handrail. Did the idea of youngsters running their hands up and down that railing give you a thrill Tim?
"They were eventually taken down but he then attempted blackmail - to put them up again - against me unless I comply with his demands.
Blackmail is such an ugly word, let's call it, trying to illicit an apology for abusing my family.
"He's posted doctored pictures of the council leader's young children with Nazi insignia.
It was British Union of Fascists insignia actually, and their faces were pixelated, it was for effect, nobody aside from the person taking the photo would have any idea who they were. Again, would not have happened if you lot hadn't directly attacked my stepson.
"He has posted vile contorted accounts of my parents' divorce, forged tweets, posted references to my neighbours, photographs of my home, most recently a direct tweet urging me to commit suicide, along with assorted lies, made-up stories and pure fantasy."
All I said was that Tim's parents were divorced, I thought it was quite important to point this out after his repeated insistence that people who are married stay together forever. There were no "forged tweets" they were all real, if I screen grabbed before you deleted that's your fault, not mine. I have never said anything detrimental about his neighbours, unless of course they're some of the idiots who spouted crap about me or my family after the last speech, because I have no idea who these neighbours are. The photograph (singular) of his home, was a guess, but thanks for confirming that I guessed right, anyway it was a google map image that is in the public domain and is a house that was predominantly paid for by the public purse, so it could be claimed that it was a photo of "our home". I've already covered the "suicide" accusation. Here it is:
Mr Loughton said despite making complaints to the police, Mr Francis had been arrested once and no charges were brought against him.
And that arrest was on questionable "evidence" and is currently being challenged through the correct channels. The reason why no charges were brought is pretty straightforward, despite the false allegations made by Loughton, I had committed no crimes and so could not be charged with any.
He said: "The police have failed to secure any charges and he carries on harassing, bullying, stalking, trolling and abusing me, my family and colleagues."
It's called telling the truth about a politician who is incompetent and continually presents rubbish as proven fact. I have provided plenty of documentary evidence to back up my claims, where's Timbo's evidence, he doesn't seem to want to share that with the press as easily as he shares his gossip and rumour.
On September 4, Mr Loughton said a Pin notice was served against him.
It was way before that, at least a month earlier.
He said: "The notice stated the police had received an allegation of harassment against me by the aforementioned constituent, making me aware if the kind of behaviour described were to continue, then I would be liable to arrest and prosecution.
"And the specific single incident behaviour which gave rise to this Pin was the act of sending a copy of Hansard to my constituent.
Publish the PIN and people will believe that it was in reference to a single incident, otherwise they only have your word for it, and that word was given under privilege, which means it is not able to be challenged and so should not be trusted.
"Apparently this had caused my ex-constituent alarm and distress. That came as a surprise to me and various others, particularly given on his blog on March 14 that ex-constituent had described how he had watched my adjournment (debate) on television with great amusement.
Again with the "Ex", this is absolute rubbish. It's nice to know that Tim reads my blog though, at least he might learn a bit about Shoreham from it, as never having lived here, he hasn't usually got a clue. As for the amusement, it's quite common for people to laugh and be intimidated simultaneously, the best example of this is probably how people react to CLOWNS.
"Apparently Hansard is a cause of alarm and distress. Our deliberations are a potent weapon of abuse if you work for Sussex Police.
Only if they're poisonous, hatred inciting gossip delivered in the style of a true coward, from behind a protective barrier.
The rest of it is just more of the same unsubstantiated rubbish, the kind of rubbish that the Harald just can't get enough of, after all they are the local Tory party's free advertising medium.
Hope that's cleared a few thing up for you all.
Take it easy out there in interweb land, there are a lot of idiots in attendance.
Night
K
The right to be consulted before being named in the press is a matter of journalistic integrity, but as the Harald has none of this, they simply pretend that they are able to print any old crap they fancy, without and right to reply from the person repeatedly named within their filthy pages.
Lets break it down.....
Let's do some correction as Oli Poole is too much of a coward to answer his phone to receive an honest interview with the person he has chosen to slander. My words in red this time.
The Conservative MP previously told the Commons that the police spent six months investigating him for alleged racist abuse after describing ''nightmare constituent" Kieran Francis as ''unkempt''.
Which is complete and utter crap, I'm getting rather fed up of pointing out the clear facts of this matter, there was no "racist" investigation, look at the law books, malicious communications can not be racially motivated, and as such cannot be an investigation into "racism". However after this investigation Loughton did say this:
Mr Loughton, MP for East Worthing and Shoreham, said his constituent stepped up an "onslaught of vile abuse", mainly against him, including doctoring photographs of his children taken from social media sites plus urging him to commit suicide, after he raised the issue during a Commons debate in March.
Right, so the death threats sent to myself and my family weren't "vile abuse", even when they were opened by a kid on Xmas eve? As for "doctoring photographs of his children taken from" his twitter account, here it is. Is this worse than Loughton and his mates cornering my aspergers stepson in the street and intimidating him after I told him to step away while the local Tories were attacking me, personally I think that posting a silly picture of his horsey faced brats, Eyore and Dobbin, is far less abusive. He chose to bring families into play, if mine are his target, then fair's fair.
As for "urging him to commit suicide", another sensationalist claim, I'm not sure exactly how one would go about trying to encourage someone's suicide, I guess that I would publicly humiliate them with lies, delivered in a forum which could not be challenged, oh no, hang on, that's what this b*stard has been doing to me, what did I do? Well, I did this.....
As you can see, it's incredibly sinister.
During this debate t he one-time education minister said he was " sacking Mr Francis as my constituent", adding that his staff had been instructed to put the phone down on him.
Mr Loughton said he planned to inform Mr Francis of this information in a letter but instead sent a complete Hansard record which included the March 13 debate .
The "sacking", yet another load of old cobblers. You see, when a statement is made in Parliament, it is recorded verbatim in the Hansard. This does not give the statement any power or legal strength, Loughton could have said anything, like sheep can fly, or that he was a really good minister, it doesn't make the statements any less incorrect just by saying them in the Hoc. The official response from Parliament regarding this sacking is this...
I wonder if "sacking" me made Timmy feel a bit like David Camoron, and all important and able to sack people who displease him. Meanwhile, in the real world, Loughton isn't an important politician like a prime minister, or even a junior minister, he's just civil servant with an expense account and delusions of grandeur.
He could have sent me it in a singing telegram, or tattooed on an elephant's scrotum, it wouldn't have made it any more factual. You can see from the official notification from Parliament which was sent to me last month, sadly I still have an incompetent MP who thinks that he can say something and it immediately becomes gospel. Loughton is an MP not a demigod, no matter how much he tries to kid himself.
But the MP said on Wednesday that this action, which he took following advice from a Parliament clerk and believed would be covered by parliamentary privilege, resulted in him receiving a police information notice (Pin) from Sussex Police.
The Pin warned that this action had caused " alarm and distress" to the ex-constituent and warned he would be liable to arrest and prosecution if that kind of behaviour continued, according to Mr Loughton.
Again he claims that the notice only mentions one incident, when any journalist worth their salt would have asked to see a copy of this PIN in order to judge for themselves whether he is being truthful. I asked to be allowed to see the other PINs, and was told that this would only happen if all parties agreed, I made it clear that I had no problem with transparency, as I have nothing to hide, but someone else refused to allow this transparency, I wonder why. As far as I understand, there was far more than one incident listed on the PIN given to Loughton, but until he shows his hand everyone will just have to believe his very public bluff. Well, Timmy I call!
The Tory told the Commons he believed Sussex Police's actions represented a "clear breach" of parliamentary privilege, which grants certain legal immunities for members to allow them to perform their duties without interference from outside the House.
It is not there to allow an MP to air their personal grievances in a very public forum and expect to be protected by some outdated legal vacuum. What duty was he performing here, he definitely doesn't represent his constituents (of which I am one) with this vigour, in fact I don't recall when he has ever directly raised the concerns of any of his constituents in the HoC in the many years that he has been paid to do this.
Mr Loughton said: "If this goes unchecked, any constituent with a grudge against his or her member of Parliament could claim harassment.
Anyone being personally attacked by another should have the right to challenge that person, be they prince, pope or plumber. Sadly this is not a reciprocal arrangement because clearly any Member of Parliament with a grudge against a constituent can claim harassment, and then when it is revealed that the constituent concerned has not broken any laws they have the right to have a public platform from which to launch a retaliatory tantrum which is far more vile than anything that was ever said to them.
"Any MP exposing any dodgy organisation in Parliament could find themselves being questioned by the police and... being given advice as to how to do our job.
What about MPs REPRESENTING dodgy organisations, can they be questioned by the police, because I have a few potential candidates. Maybe if Loughton was capable of doing his job, people wouldn't need to tell him how to do it, he should be grateful for the helpful hints, I assume it was along the lines of ,"when an MP writes to a member of the public, it is probably best if you don't call them names and swear at them, because that isn't very nice. If people do this to you, you expect them to be arrested, if you do it, you should expect the same. Your job title isn't an exemption from the law you know Tim".
"Indeed, Abu Hamza may well have a case against (Home Secretary Theresa May) for being rightly beastly about him in Parliament and find herself on the receiving end of a police information notice."
Mr Loughton's motion for the Pin to be referred to the Committee of Privileges was passed unopposed in the Commons.
Yes Tim, I'm just like Abu Hamza aren't I? A reported terrorist and preacher of hate. Say that again and I'll tell everyone that in your spare time, you like to dress as a middle aged woman and pretend to be a powerful important person like Teresa May rather than the saggy old sacked minister that you really are. You never know, I might decide not to do that and instead reveal some other dirty secret of yours that is actually true.
Moving the motion, Mr Loughton said he had no communication with his ex-constituent since sending the Hansard record while he claimed Mr Francis had "stepped up an onslaught of vile abuse", which included targeting the leader and chairman of Adur District Council, among others.
Mr Loughton said: "Yesterday he (Mr Francis) was abusing the organisers of Worthing Mental Health Awareness Week, which I have launched, and to date he has posted on his blog or sent tweets to or about me and my council colleagues on well over 200 occasions.
Only 200, that's nothing compared to the thousands of hate filled emails and social media attacks that I received from his extremist pals after his last tirade of lies and abuse, in both Parliament and his direct contact with his mates at the Daily Mail.
"Many come under the heading of political abuse which, however offensive that is, we all know it is part of our job.
"However, what is not part of that job is they have included doctored photographs of my children taken from their social media sites - what a man in his 40s is doing trawling the social media sites of teenage girls I do not know.
Oh, after the terrorist insinuation, we now have a paedophile suggestion, Loughton is really a filthy minded little man isn't he. You would think that someone who is consistently trying to surround themselves with youngsters despite not being a children's minister any more would attract some tricky questions.
"They were eventually taken down but he then attempted blackmail - to put them up again - against me unless I comply with his demands.
Blackmail is such an ugly word, let's call it, trying to illicit an apology for abusing my family.
"He's posted doctored pictures of the council leader's young children with Nazi insignia.
It was British Union of Fascists insignia actually, and their faces were pixelated, it was for effect, nobody aside from the person taking the photo would have any idea who they were. Again, would not have happened if you lot hadn't directly attacked my stepson.
"He has posted vile contorted accounts of my parents' divorce, forged tweets, posted references to my neighbours, photographs of my home, most recently a direct tweet urging me to commit suicide, along with assorted lies, made-up stories and pure fantasy."
All I said was that Tim's parents were divorced, I thought it was quite important to point this out after his repeated insistence that people who are married stay together forever. There were no "forged tweets" they were all real, if I screen grabbed before you deleted that's your fault, not mine. I have never said anything detrimental about his neighbours, unless of course they're some of the idiots who spouted crap about me or my family after the last speech, because I have no idea who these neighbours are. The photograph (singular) of his home, was a guess, but thanks for confirming that I guessed right, anyway it was a google map image that is in the public domain and is a house that was predominantly paid for by the public purse, so it could be claimed that it was a photo of "our home". I've already covered the "suicide" accusation. Here it is:
Mr Loughton said despite making complaints to the police, Mr Francis had been arrested once and no charges were brought against him.
And that arrest was on questionable "evidence" and is currently being challenged through the correct channels. The reason why no charges were brought is pretty straightforward, despite the false allegations made by Loughton, I had committed no crimes and so could not be charged with any.
He said: "The police have failed to secure any charges and he carries on harassing, bullying, stalking, trolling and abusing me, my family and colleagues."
It's called telling the truth about a politician who is incompetent and continually presents rubbish as proven fact. I have provided plenty of documentary evidence to back up my claims, where's Timbo's evidence, he doesn't seem to want to share that with the press as easily as he shares his gossip and rumour.
On September 4, Mr Loughton said a Pin notice was served against him.
It was way before that, at least a month earlier.
He said: "The notice stated the police had received an allegation of harassment against me by the aforementioned constituent, making me aware if the kind of behaviour described were to continue, then I would be liable to arrest and prosecution.
"And the specific single incident behaviour which gave rise to this Pin was the act of sending a copy of Hansard to my constituent.
Publish the PIN and people will believe that it was in reference to a single incident, otherwise they only have your word for it, and that word was given under privilege, which means it is not able to be challenged and so should not be trusted.
"Apparently this had caused my ex-constituent alarm and distress. That came as a surprise to me and various others, particularly given on his blog on March 14 that ex-constituent had described how he had watched my adjournment (debate) on television with great amusement.
Again with the "Ex", this is absolute rubbish. It's nice to know that Tim reads my blog though, at least he might learn a bit about Shoreham from it, as never having lived here, he hasn't usually got a clue. As for the amusement, it's quite common for people to laugh and be intimidated simultaneously, the best example of this is probably how people react to CLOWNS.
"Apparently Hansard is a cause of alarm and distress. Our deliberations are a potent weapon of abuse if you work for Sussex Police.
Only if they're poisonous, hatred inciting gossip delivered in the style of a true coward, from behind a protective barrier.
The rest of it is just more of the same unsubstantiated rubbish, the kind of rubbish that the Harald just can't get enough of, after all they are the local Tory party's free advertising medium.
Hope that's cleared a few thing up for you all.
Take it easy out there in interweb land, there are a lot of idiots in attendance.
Night
K
Thursday, 10 October 2013
Tim Loughton's Parliamentary Tirade under the excuse of Privilege.
This is going to be a bit texty, but it needs to contain facts, and although I usually try to dress up facts with a bit of humour, this is a very important post and is a full response to this pathetic individual's attempts to attack myself yet again in an unprecedented exploitation of Parliamentary Privilege by using it as a means of throwing his toys from the pram in a safe environment, where he isn't restricted by the outside world and the laws concerning libel or harassment, in short, the coward is hiding behind teacher and sticking his tongue out in the hope that he will not be challenged on his lies.
Well Tim, the real world is here, and your stupid rule written in 1689 makes sod all difference to me and I've had enough of your bullshit and the pathetic cowardly manner in which you distribute it.
The Loughton tantrum is in white, and my notes are in this colour.
9 Oct 2013 : Column 167
You will recall, Mr Speaker, my Adjournment debate on 13 March when you kindly sat in the Chair to hear the extraordinary and completely fictitious story of the six-month investigation into me by Sussex police on account of a single e-mail I had sent to a constituent in which I had wrongly and rudely endorsed the right of my local council, Adur council, to refer to a particularly troublesome resident as “unkempt” and unlawfully operate a blacklist which was subsequently overturned by the ICO. Subsequently the constituent complained that as he claimed to be of Romany Gypsy origin, unbeknown to me or anybody else even though he and the council were informed of this in writing on previous occasions, this was in some way racist so it was investigated under the malicious communications act which cannot under British law be racially motivated. When the case was rightly thrown out six months later, I questioned the bizarre behaviour of Sussex police in wasting so much time and taxpayers’ resources on an obviously vexatious complaint from a serial complainer Loughton then lodged repeated complaints against Sussex Police officers and staff which were not upheld, but does not view himself as a vexatious serial complainer. I also raised the implications this had for the right of other hon. Members to correspond with their constituents in an abusive sweary manner without fear of the police knocking on their constituency doors.
The heavily dramatized and mostly fictional account I gave during the debate raised, unsurprisingly, disbelief and indignation in equal proportions and it nearly roused half of the chamber from their deep sleep and distracted the rest from their Twitter feeds, there were about a dozen people present. However, what has transpired since will, I am sure, top that and, again, has implications for the way in which all hon. Members go about their business. I believe it represents a clear breach of parliamentary privilege by Sussex police, and in the full knowledge of the Chief Constable Martin Richards whom Loughton had previously described as "a very stupid Chief Constable".
In the debate, I stated that such was the vile abuse that had been aimed at me and my staff by the constituent and his attempts to have me prosecuted that it was no longer tenable for me to act as his MP even though as an MP Loughton doesn't actually have this right under any act of Parliament. I said, therefore, that I would no longer be responding to his correspondence or abusive phone calls, which had left my staff in tears which was apparently a member of staff who was pregnant at the time, which to be honest, I have my doubts about, I accept that it is difficult to tell if someone is pregnant over the phone or not, but I'm pretty sure that HE didn't sound pregnant or in tears for that matter. I proposed to write to him to that effect but, given the spurious grounds on which he had previously referred my correspondence to the police, I first sought the assurance of the chief constable that such a straightforward and innocuous letter would not again lead to their involvement. In a singularly obstructive meeting, in which he repeatedly stated that he had complete confidence that the police had handled the case perfectly correctly, Chief Constable Martin Richards refused to comment on my proposed letter.
Subsequently I sought guidance from the Clerk, who in contrast has been singularly helpful maybe because he wasn't referred to as a "very stupid clerk". He advised me that I should send a complete copy of the Hansard record of 13 March, including the report of the debate, to the constituent, with a compliment slip and without any need for a covering letter, and that that would be protected by parliamentary privilege. That is exactly what I did. Subsequently I have had no communications
9 Oct 2013 : Column 168
with my ex-constituent who is not an ex constituent but a current one, the only way that Loughton gets rid of me is by me moving or him resigning, and I ain't moving, have made no public statement and have not responded to or initiated any social media to do with him. Aside from providing the Daily Mail with my address and mobile and home phone numbers, and pointing me out to a fat thug in his employ who promptly approached and assaulted me whilst I was out shopping with the kid.
In contrast, the constituent has stepped up an onslaught of vile and reasonably humorous abuse since 13 March, primarily against me as well as the leader and the chairman of Adur district council, his ward councillor and assorted others who cross his path and who then proceeded to punched me. Yesterday he abused the organisers of Worthing mental health awareness week, I apparently abused them by sending a copy of Loughton's private lobbying group's mission statement which contained absolute tripe about mental health conditions and they objected to because ironically, mental health awareness week is all about being happy which I launched, and to date he has posted on his blog and sent tweets to or about me and my councillor colleagues on well over 200 occasions. Yes this is called freedom of speech, us mere plebs have this as well, but we are responsible under the law unlike privileged tossers who like to award themselves extra privilege wherever possible.
Many come under the heading of political abuse, which, however offensive it may be, we all know is part of our job especially if you're an out of touch Tory bigot. However, what is not part of our job is that they have included doctored photographs of my children, taken from their social media sites actually taken from his twitter account and all I said was that they were called Dobbin and Eyore, because like most Tory MPs kids they looked more than a little horsey. What a man in his 40s is doing trawling the social media sites of teenage girls, I do not know Just what are you alluding to by this then Tim, would you be trying to insinuate that I am some kind of paedophile? There are a lot more pictures of Loughton hanging around in school playgrounds than there are of me, that's for sure, and I don't regularly visit houses of ill repute either, not like some..... They were eventually taken down, but he then attempted to blackmail me, saying he would put them up again unless I complied with his demands Shall I tell you what that demand was. It was that he apologise for the offensive personally abusive email that he sent to my stepson and that his mate Parkin (the blind leader of the blind) also apologise for cornering and intimidating him in Shoreham town centre. He has posted doctored pictures of the council leader’s young children regaled with Nazi insignia This is an absolute lie, it was a BUF badge, can't Timmy tell the difference between Nazi's and his party's past associates?. He has posted vile, contorted accounts of my parents’ divorce I said they were divorced, that was it, seemed relevant when Loughton was consistently ranting about how important it is to be married, forged tweets No Tim, they were real tweets and you sent them, posted references to my neighbours er, no, didn't do that at all, but I guess that this was to add credence to your next claim and photographs of my home Yes, a shot from Google maps (correctly credited I might add) and this was in response to the repeated publication of my address by the press and the complete lack of equality in naming Loughton's address in the same way. I said it was Wellhouse Lane, I never told anyone that it was The Old Barn, but anyone can find that out on the web when looking at directorships of companies not declared as interests by one's MP, and most recently a direct tweet urging me to commit suicide, Which has already been posted in full and it was simply encouraging Loughton to jump off a cliff for charity during an abseiling event, I even offered to sponsor him if he did it along with assorted lies, made up stories and pure fantasy Most of it, well researched factual presentations, backed up with evidence. Hang about, are we living in backwards land? Facts and documentary evidence is fantasy and unproven statements made in HoC under cover of a "get out of jail free card" are clearly more viable. He has also recently sought to disrupt our regular street surgeries and pour his abuse on anyone who happens to be in the vicinity this would be the single time I was passing and he sent someone over to punch me, I didn't see the sign that said "Surgery for all residents except Kieran who has socks that have resided in Shoreham longer than the MP and chair combined" (five years old), and to menace guests at the chairman’s charity dance No, you've lost me again, we did see the event venue, and myself and my family had a sandwich and a drink of juice on a bench nearby, but I can't recall doing any "menacing" Oh, and the dance was to raise money for the Cult of Scientology. I guess we all sometimes have to deal with very nasty people, but this one wins all the awards. He is talking about himself and the local councillors here right?
Despite my complaints—which have led to the man’s arrest on just one occasion— Which is currently being challenged as unlawful arrest as the warrant was issued on allegedly perjured information the police have failed to secure any charges This is all sounding a bit "same but different" to me. So him being questioned and not charged is wrong, but me being questioned and not charged is also wrong, but for him it's the questioning decision that was wrong, for me it was the charging decision. So in effect he thinks that he should not be questioned or charged for any unlawful act he may commit, but I should be questioned and charged whether I commit any offence or not, sounds like someone thinks that they should be above the law. and he carries on harassing, bullying, stalking, trolling and abusing me, my family and colleagues. By doing a similar thing to him, only I am providing evidence and points of reference, rather than sensationalist statements without merit I am apparently the bad guy, I would call it "exposing facts", "providing evidence" and "revealing the truth" and other such phrases but it seems like they aren't in vogue at the moment like "trolling" is although growing up around Brighton, I'm not sure whether I understand which definition he is referring to, it's always difficult with Tory MPs. Anyway, his family and colleagues were never in the sights until they were put there by others in order to provide a human shield for the politicos. However, on 4 September, really? I knew about him getting one about a month earlier but you never can trust Tory MPs when it comes to providing facts out of the blue I had a formal police information notice served on me by Sussex police for harassment. Other hon. Members will probably have come across these notices when used on constituents in anti-social-behaviour cases. So MPs should only come across this kind of thing when they're dishing it out, how very dare anyone give them something that they view as a tool to keep us under control. The notice stated that the police had received an allegation of harassment against me by the aforementioned constituent, making me aware that if the kind of behaviour described were to continue I would be liable to arrest and prosecution. The specific single incident of behaviour that gave rise to this PIN was the act of sending a copy of Hansard to my ex-constituent. Come on Timbo, we both know that there's more than that one thing written on there, but you've done all you can to keep the rest under wraps haven't you? If that is all that is written on there show us it, go on. Apparently this had caused him alarm and distress. That came as a surprise to me and various others, particularly given that on his blog on 14 March that ex-constituent had described how he had watched my Adjournment debate on television with “great amusement.” Therefore, apparently, Hansard is a cause of alarm and distress, and Sussex police believe that our deliberations are a potent weapon of abuse. It wasn't so much the Hansard itself, but the accompanying death threats sent to myself and my family by you and yours (previously published), and not to mention the fact that you personally referred to me as a "p*key c*nt" (evidence provided already), but we wouldn't want the people out there in media land to know about all of that stuff would we now?
Keith Vaz (Leicester East) (Lab): Will the hon. Gentleman give way?
Tim Loughton: I will not give way, if I may.
For good measure, the leader of Adur council, the chairman of the council and my constituent’s ward councillor were also issued with PINs for supposed harassment, as was my constituent. Clearly, that has only fuelled his vile crusade. Personally I'm not going to go crying to mummy about a piece of paper that contains far too many "if", "may", "could" and "possibly"'s to be legally binding in any way, and as I understand the Leader (Neil Parkin) was for harassing my stepson, and the Chair (Mendacious Mendoza) for assaulting myself upon Loughton's command, as for Cllr Darren Burns, he probably thought that he received two notices due to his constant state of inebriation, that's if he even noticed at all, as he's been pissed since 1994.
9 Oct 2013 : Column 169
Apparently, a gold group Which sounds a bit "Captain Scarlet" to me led by Assistant Chief Constable Robin Merrett met on 3 July to approve those PINs at the highest level. Two months later, they were served on me and my councillor colleagues without me knowing that a complaint of harassment had even been made against me, or that I was under any investigation, in clear breach of the police guidance, to quote one of ADC's favourite lines, it says "guidance" it is not a law or even a rule set in stone, it is up to our discretion which states that I should be given the opportunity to be interviewed to account for my actions and show that they were reasonable and lawful. No such interview took place. So he wants to be interviewed then? Quick officer arrest that man, he's clearly challenging you just to see if you will. There is no appeal against the PIN, which remains on file for at least one year.
The increasingly hapless Detective Chief Inspector Wardley-Wilkins, who has led the investigations, having failed to secure vital evidence, having misled me about the earlier investigation and the current one and having failed to explain why he has breached police guidance, has offered me instructions on how I should correspond with constituents without risking a PIN. That is the police telling us how to do our job. Well someone needs to tell you how to do it, you've been pretty crap at it so far, that's why Dave sacked you for being an "incompetent narcissist".
The chief constable, who has been copied in on all the events, has been content to waste taxpayers’ resources on this nonsense while the senior management of his force is brought into disrepute. He has clearly lost the plot when it comes to distinguishing between the victim and the perpetrator. I know that my local police officers, whom I rate highly, are as embarrassed and gobsmacked as I am at this action by their bosses. So this is Tim admitting that he has attempted to influence police officers and that he has been discussing an ongoing investigation with outside officers, who definitely should be held to account for expressing their personal opinions to a member of the public, which in this matter he is.
Such a sequence of events would offend against natural justice were it suffered by any of our constituents, and we would rightly raise the matter in the House. Don't lie Timbonoccio, you've never raised any such issue on behalf of a constituent, you always reply to them that you cannot get involved in an ongoing investigation, because you are not permitted. However, in this case, the events are an intolerable affront to the rights of the House and hon. Members to go about their business of representing their constituents without fear or favour. Although they expect plenty of favours when it comes to allowances and induce much fear every time there's a budget. If it goes unchecked, any constituent with a grudge against his or her Member of Parliament could claim harassment. Any hon. Member exposing any dodgy organisation in I think he means "like" not "in" Parliament could find themselves being questioned by the police, or, with reference to DCI Wardley-Wilkins, being given advice on how to do their jobs. Indeed, Abu Hamza could well have a case against the Home Secretary for being rightly beastly about him in Parliament and could find herself on the receiving end of a police information notice. And maybe Abu Hamza would show more compassion if he did Timbo's job, he might follow the rules a bit better too.
Therefore, for all hon. Members, I propose that we pass the motion and refer the matter to the Committee of Privileges.
Question put and agreed to.
Yes, Tim Loughton "passed a motion" and it came out of his mouth.
I hope that this has cleared up a few points, there may be more on it later, but that's my initial thoughts on this putrid pile of parliamentary pigsh*t.
K
Well Tim, the real world is here, and your stupid rule written in 1689 makes sod all difference to me and I've had enough of your bullshit and the pathetic cowardly manner in which you distribute it.
The Loughton tantrum is in white, and my notes are in this colour.
9 Oct 2013 : Column 167
Privilege
12.43 pm
Tim Loughton (East Worthing and Shoreham) (Con): I beg to move,
That the Police Information Notice from Sussex Police addressed to the hon. Member for East Worthing and Shoreham, dated 4 September 2013, be referred to the Committee of Privileges.
I am very grateful, Mr Speaker, for the opportunity to raise a matter relating to a breach of parliamentary privilege by Sussex police and briefly to provide the context to this motion to refer the matter to the Committee of Privileges.You will recall, Mr Speaker, my Adjournment debate on 13 March when you kindly sat in the Chair to hear the extraordinary and completely fictitious story of the six-month investigation into me by Sussex police on account of a single e-mail I had sent to a constituent in which I had wrongly and rudely endorsed the right of my local council, Adur council, to refer to a particularly troublesome resident as “unkempt” and unlawfully operate a blacklist which was subsequently overturned by the ICO. Subsequently the constituent complained that as he claimed to be of Romany Gypsy origin, unbeknown to me or anybody else even though he and the council were informed of this in writing on previous occasions, this was in some way racist so it was investigated under the malicious communications act which cannot under British law be racially motivated. When the case was rightly thrown out six months later, I questioned the bizarre behaviour of Sussex police in wasting so much time and taxpayers’ resources on an obviously vexatious complaint from a serial complainer Loughton then lodged repeated complaints against Sussex Police officers and staff which were not upheld, but does not view himself as a vexatious serial complainer. I also raised the implications this had for the right of other hon. Members to correspond with their constituents in an abusive sweary manner without fear of the police knocking on their constituency doors.
The heavily dramatized and mostly fictional account I gave during the debate raised, unsurprisingly, disbelief and indignation in equal proportions and it nearly roused half of the chamber from their deep sleep and distracted the rest from their Twitter feeds, there were about a dozen people present. However, what has transpired since will, I am sure, top that and, again, has implications for the way in which all hon. Members go about their business. I believe it represents a clear breach of parliamentary privilege by Sussex police, and in the full knowledge of the Chief Constable Martin Richards whom Loughton had previously described as "a very stupid Chief Constable".
In the debate, I stated that such was the vile abuse that had been aimed at me and my staff by the constituent and his attempts to have me prosecuted that it was no longer tenable for me to act as his MP even though as an MP Loughton doesn't actually have this right under any act of Parliament. I said, therefore, that I would no longer be responding to his correspondence or abusive phone calls, which had left my staff in tears which was apparently a member of staff who was pregnant at the time, which to be honest, I have my doubts about, I accept that it is difficult to tell if someone is pregnant over the phone or not, but I'm pretty sure that HE didn't sound pregnant or in tears for that matter. I proposed to write to him to that effect but, given the spurious grounds on which he had previously referred my correspondence to the police, I first sought the assurance of the chief constable that such a straightforward and innocuous letter would not again lead to their involvement. In a singularly obstructive meeting, in which he repeatedly stated that he had complete confidence that the police had handled the case perfectly correctly, Chief Constable Martin Richards refused to comment on my proposed letter.
Subsequently I sought guidance from the Clerk, who in contrast has been singularly helpful maybe because he wasn't referred to as a "very stupid clerk". He advised me that I should send a complete copy of the Hansard record of 13 March, including the report of the debate, to the constituent, with a compliment slip and without any need for a covering letter, and that that would be protected by parliamentary privilege. That is exactly what I did. Subsequently I have had no communications
with my ex-constituent who is not an ex constituent but a current one, the only way that Loughton gets rid of me is by me moving or him resigning, and I ain't moving, have made no public statement and have not responded to or initiated any social media to do with him. Aside from providing the Daily Mail with my address and mobile and home phone numbers, and pointing me out to a fat thug in his employ who promptly approached and assaulted me whilst I was out shopping with the kid.
In contrast, the constituent has stepped up an onslaught of vile and reasonably humorous abuse since 13 March, primarily against me as well as the leader and the chairman of Adur district council, his ward councillor and assorted others who cross his path and who then proceeded to punched me. Yesterday he abused the organisers of Worthing mental health awareness week, I apparently abused them by sending a copy of Loughton's private lobbying group's mission statement which contained absolute tripe about mental health conditions and they objected to because ironically, mental health awareness week is all about being happy which I launched, and to date he has posted on his blog and sent tweets to or about me and my councillor colleagues on well over 200 occasions. Yes this is called freedom of speech, us mere plebs have this as well, but we are responsible under the law unlike privileged tossers who like to award themselves extra privilege wherever possible.
Many come under the heading of political abuse, which, however offensive it may be, we all know is part of our job especially if you're an out of touch Tory bigot. However, what is not part of our job is that they have included doctored photographs of my children, taken from their social media sites actually taken from his twitter account and all I said was that they were called Dobbin and Eyore, because like most Tory MPs kids they looked more than a little horsey. What a man in his 40s is doing trawling the social media sites of teenage girls, I do not know Just what are you alluding to by this then Tim, would you be trying to insinuate that I am some kind of paedophile? There are a lot more pictures of Loughton hanging around in school playgrounds than there are of me, that's for sure, and I don't regularly visit houses of ill repute either, not like some..... They were eventually taken down, but he then attempted to blackmail me, saying he would put them up again unless I complied with his demands Shall I tell you what that demand was. It was that he apologise for the offensive personally abusive email that he sent to my stepson and that his mate Parkin (the blind leader of the blind) also apologise for cornering and intimidating him in Shoreham town centre. He has posted doctored pictures of the council leader’s young children regaled with Nazi insignia This is an absolute lie, it was a BUF badge, can't Timmy tell the difference between Nazi's and his party's past associates?. He has posted vile, contorted accounts of my parents’ divorce I said they were divorced, that was it, seemed relevant when Loughton was consistently ranting about how important it is to be married, forged tweets No Tim, they were real tweets and you sent them, posted references to my neighbours er, no, didn't do that at all, but I guess that this was to add credence to your next claim and photographs of my home Yes, a shot from Google maps (correctly credited I might add) and this was in response to the repeated publication of my address by the press and the complete lack of equality in naming Loughton's address in the same way. I said it was Wellhouse Lane, I never told anyone that it was The Old Barn, but anyone can find that out on the web when looking at directorships of companies not declared as interests by one's MP, and most recently a direct tweet urging me to commit suicide, Which has already been posted in full and it was simply encouraging Loughton to jump off a cliff for charity during an abseiling event, I even offered to sponsor him if he did it along with assorted lies, made up stories and pure fantasy Most of it, well researched factual presentations, backed up with evidence. Hang about, are we living in backwards land? Facts and documentary evidence is fantasy and unproven statements made in HoC under cover of a "get out of jail free card" are clearly more viable. He has also recently sought to disrupt our regular street surgeries and pour his abuse on anyone who happens to be in the vicinity this would be the single time I was passing and he sent someone over to punch me, I didn't see the sign that said "Surgery for all residents except Kieran who has socks that have resided in Shoreham longer than the MP and chair combined" (five years old), and to menace guests at the chairman’s charity dance No, you've lost me again, we did see the event venue, and myself and my family had a sandwich and a drink of juice on a bench nearby, but I can't recall doing any "menacing" Oh, and the dance was to raise money for the Cult of Scientology. I guess we all sometimes have to deal with very nasty people, but this one wins all the awards. He is talking about himself and the local councillors here right?
Despite my complaints—which have led to the man’s arrest on just one occasion— Which is currently being challenged as unlawful arrest as the warrant was issued on allegedly perjured information the police have failed to secure any charges This is all sounding a bit "same but different" to me. So him being questioned and not charged is wrong, but me being questioned and not charged is also wrong, but for him it's the questioning decision that was wrong, for me it was the charging decision. So in effect he thinks that he should not be questioned or charged for any unlawful act he may commit, but I should be questioned and charged whether I commit any offence or not, sounds like someone thinks that they should be above the law. and he carries on harassing, bullying, stalking, trolling and abusing me, my family and colleagues. By doing a similar thing to him, only I am providing evidence and points of reference, rather than sensationalist statements without merit I am apparently the bad guy, I would call it "exposing facts", "providing evidence" and "revealing the truth" and other such phrases but it seems like they aren't in vogue at the moment like "trolling" is although growing up around Brighton, I'm not sure whether I understand which definition he is referring to, it's always difficult with Tory MPs. Anyway, his family and colleagues were never in the sights until they were put there by others in order to provide a human shield for the politicos. However, on 4 September, really? I knew about him getting one about a month earlier but you never can trust Tory MPs when it comes to providing facts out of the blue I had a formal police information notice served on me by Sussex police for harassment. Other hon. Members will probably have come across these notices when used on constituents in anti-social-behaviour cases. So MPs should only come across this kind of thing when they're dishing it out, how very dare anyone give them something that they view as a tool to keep us under control. The notice stated that the police had received an allegation of harassment against me by the aforementioned constituent, making me aware that if the kind of behaviour described were to continue I would be liable to arrest and prosecution. The specific single incident of behaviour that gave rise to this PIN was the act of sending a copy of Hansard to my ex-constituent. Come on Timbo, we both know that there's more than that one thing written on there, but you've done all you can to keep the rest under wraps haven't you? If that is all that is written on there show us it, go on. Apparently this had caused him alarm and distress. That came as a surprise to me and various others, particularly given that on his blog on 14 March that ex-constituent had described how he had watched my Adjournment debate on television with “great amusement.” Therefore, apparently, Hansard is a cause of alarm and distress, and Sussex police believe that our deliberations are a potent weapon of abuse. It wasn't so much the Hansard itself, but the accompanying death threats sent to myself and my family by you and yours (previously published), and not to mention the fact that you personally referred to me as a "p*key c*nt" (evidence provided already), but we wouldn't want the people out there in media land to know about all of that stuff would we now?
Keith Vaz (Leicester East) (Lab): Will the hon. Gentleman give way?
Tim Loughton: I will not give way, if I may.
For good measure, the leader of Adur council, the chairman of the council and my constituent’s ward councillor were also issued with PINs for supposed harassment, as was my constituent. Clearly, that has only fuelled his vile crusade. Personally I'm not going to go crying to mummy about a piece of paper that contains far too many "if", "may", "could" and "possibly"'s to be legally binding in any way, and as I understand the Leader (Neil Parkin) was for harassing my stepson, and the Chair (Mendacious Mendoza) for assaulting myself upon Loughton's command, as for Cllr Darren Burns, he probably thought that he received two notices due to his constant state of inebriation, that's if he even noticed at all, as he's been pissed since 1994.
Apparently, a gold group Which sounds a bit "Captain Scarlet" to me led by Assistant Chief Constable Robin Merrett met on 3 July to approve those PINs at the highest level. Two months later, they were served on me and my councillor colleagues without me knowing that a complaint of harassment had even been made against me, or that I was under any investigation, in clear breach of the police guidance, to quote one of ADC's favourite lines, it says "guidance" it is not a law or even a rule set in stone, it is up to our discretion which states that I should be given the opportunity to be interviewed to account for my actions and show that they were reasonable and lawful. No such interview took place. So he wants to be interviewed then? Quick officer arrest that man, he's clearly challenging you just to see if you will. There is no appeal against the PIN, which remains on file for at least one year.
The increasingly hapless Detective Chief Inspector Wardley-Wilkins, who has led the investigations, having failed to secure vital evidence, having misled me about the earlier investigation and the current one and having failed to explain why he has breached police guidance, has offered me instructions on how I should correspond with constituents without risking a PIN. That is the police telling us how to do our job. Well someone needs to tell you how to do it, you've been pretty crap at it so far, that's why Dave sacked you for being an "incompetent narcissist".
The chief constable, who has been copied in on all the events, has been content to waste taxpayers’ resources on this nonsense while the senior management of his force is brought into disrepute. He has clearly lost the plot when it comes to distinguishing between the victim and the perpetrator. I know that my local police officers, whom I rate highly, are as embarrassed and gobsmacked as I am at this action by their bosses. So this is Tim admitting that he has attempted to influence police officers and that he has been discussing an ongoing investigation with outside officers, who definitely should be held to account for expressing their personal opinions to a member of the public, which in this matter he is.
Such a sequence of events would offend against natural justice were it suffered by any of our constituents, and we would rightly raise the matter in the House. Don't lie Timbonoccio, you've never raised any such issue on behalf of a constituent, you always reply to them that you cannot get involved in an ongoing investigation, because you are not permitted. However, in this case, the events are an intolerable affront to the rights of the House and hon. Members to go about their business of representing their constituents without fear or favour. Although they expect plenty of favours when it comes to allowances and induce much fear every time there's a budget. If it goes unchecked, any constituent with a grudge against his or her Member of Parliament could claim harassment. Any hon. Member exposing any dodgy organisation in I think he means "like" not "in" Parliament could find themselves being questioned by the police, or, with reference to DCI Wardley-Wilkins, being given advice on how to do their jobs. Indeed, Abu Hamza could well have a case against the Home Secretary for being rightly beastly about him in Parliament and could find herself on the receiving end of a police information notice. And maybe Abu Hamza would show more compassion if he did Timbo's job, he might follow the rules a bit better too.
Therefore, for all hon. Members, I propose that we pass the motion and refer the matter to the Committee of Privileges.
Question put and agreed to.
Yes, Tim Loughton "passed a motion" and it came out of his mouth.
I hope that this has cleared up a few points, there may be more on it later, but that's my initial thoughts on this putrid pile of parliamentary pigsh*t.
K
Wednesday, 9 October 2013
Loughton tables "Son of Tantrum" debate.
The BBC have revealed tonight that Tim Loughton has tabled another "emergency" debate to air his personal grievances in Parliament again.
Obviously I am preparing for another attack, and this time there will be no punches pulled, I'm not taking any more of his lies presented as fact, purely because he thinks that Parliamentary privilege allows him to say whatever he likes and believes that he should not be held to account for it.
Parliamentary privilege was afforded to MPs in 1689, alongside the right for protestants to bear arms, and so are an outdated concept and this privilege is only there to prevent inhibition of parliamentary business by libel laws and civil arrest (which no longer exists), they are not a "get out of jail free card" for jaded ex ministers to have a pop at people.
It is being put forward as a matter of privilege, aren't these idiots privileged enough already? The country's turning to shit and Loughton thinks that his personal grievances are far more important than little insignificant matters like the NHS or unemployment.
Yes, Loughton was served with a police Information Notice to cease harassment, this was served over a month ago as far as I am aware, along with several others, but I can't see why he feels that he should be above the law simply because of his job title.
His previous diatribe was completely fabricated, not an ounce of truth in any of it, and I expect tomorrow's rant to be no different.
He goes on about his 90 minute interview by appointment, and how absolutely outrageous this was, but forgets to mention that he has since attempted to lie his way to having me arrested twice, having my home searched for items which never existed and at the last count there were seven retaliatory reports made by him and his fellow local party members against myself, and he claims that a 90 minute interview was a waste of police resources.
He has sent thugs to assault me, tabloid reporters to stalk me and his pet police officers round to search my home on a dodgy warrant, and yet he feels hard done by enough to waste parliamentary time in order to try and place himself above the law for actions that would see any member of the public dragged from their home and locked in a cell.
Luckily as I have broken no laws, I have never been charged with any offence as none were committed by me. The more cynical might think that this debate is an attempt to ensure that Loughton will be viewed as the victim of revenge by Sussex Police if he is nicked for anything in the near future, this trick has worked for several MPs in the past and looks to be a standard parliamentary manoeuvre.
I can only assume that tomorrow's debate is to be another assault on myself, and more, "whinging, self-serving, poisonous bollocks that seem to have become his hallmark".
Any further attacks on myself will be viewed as the harassment that they clearly are, and when the readers of my blog are equal to the audience of the media attracted by Loughton I will accept that we are even, until then each act of aggression will be reciprocated in kind.
The Law is for all
K
Obviously I am preparing for another attack, and this time there will be no punches pulled, I'm not taking any more of his lies presented as fact, purely because he thinks that Parliamentary privilege allows him to say whatever he likes and believes that he should not be held to account for it.
Parliamentary privilege was afforded to MPs in 1689, alongside the right for protestants to bear arms, and so are an outdated concept and this privilege is only there to prevent inhibition of parliamentary business by libel laws and civil arrest (which no longer exists), they are not a "get out of jail free card" for jaded ex ministers to have a pop at people.
It is being put forward as a matter of privilege, aren't these idiots privileged enough already? The country's turning to shit and Loughton thinks that his personal grievances are far more important than little insignificant matters like the NHS or unemployment.
Yes, Loughton was served with a police Information Notice to cease harassment, this was served over a month ago as far as I am aware, along with several others, but I can't see why he feels that he should be above the law simply because of his job title.
His previous diatribe was completely fabricated, not an ounce of truth in any of it, and I expect tomorrow's rant to be no different.
He goes on about his 90 minute interview by appointment, and how absolutely outrageous this was, but forgets to mention that he has since attempted to lie his way to having me arrested twice, having my home searched for items which never existed and at the last count there were seven retaliatory reports made by him and his fellow local party members against myself, and he claims that a 90 minute interview was a waste of police resources.
He has sent thugs to assault me, tabloid reporters to stalk me and his pet police officers round to search my home on a dodgy warrant, and yet he feels hard done by enough to waste parliamentary time in order to try and place himself above the law for actions that would see any member of the public dragged from their home and locked in a cell.
Luckily as I have broken no laws, I have never been charged with any offence as none were committed by me. The more cynical might think that this debate is an attempt to ensure that Loughton will be viewed as the victim of revenge by Sussex Police if he is nicked for anything in the near future, this trick has worked for several MPs in the past and looks to be a standard parliamentary manoeuvre.
I can only assume that tomorrow's debate is to be another assault on myself, and more, "whinging, self-serving, poisonous bollocks that seem to have become his hallmark".
Any further attacks on myself will be viewed as the harassment that they clearly are, and when the readers of my blog are equal to the audience of the media attracted by Loughton I will accept that we are even, until then each act of aggression will be reciprocated in kind.
The Law is for all
K
Tuesday, 8 October 2013
If ignorance is bliss, Tim Loughton will never suffer from depression.
I see that Worthing Mental Health Awareness Week, have published their opening ceremony and speech by Tim, not nice and dim.
Another ill informed performance, from Timbo, and further example how he likes to appear to be an authority on everything, when the only thing he is proficient in, is talking "bollocks" fluently.
During this "one size fits all" speech with extra "mental health" added at several points, he claimed to have been the shadow minister for mental health, which is complete rubbish, he was nothing of the sort, because the post doesn't exist. Looks like after being overlooked in the reshuffle he has decided to make up some titles for himself that sound important, and after all, us mere plebs would never notice it anyway, would we?
As we have already seen from his previous claims, ...
...poor parenting is the reason for mental disorders. What a surprise that Loughton states that he has a family member who was affected by mental health issues. Does this mean that there are some poor parenting skills in play inside the Loughton camp? Clearly it does, unless of course he's talking "bollocks" again, I did hear that his father has an imaginary friend called Jesus, is that a mental health condition Tim?
Probably the most offensive part of his speech, was his claim about supporting lots of local mental health charities, like Worthing Mind, who told me that they never see him, and he only turns up if there's a press photographer in attendance. He also included "headway" in this part of his speech. Now although headway are a brilliant charity, they are neither local to Worthing, or a mental health charity. Headway do a fantastic job, but that job relates to acquired brain injuries, not mental health conditions. Is Timbo suggesting that the two are somehow linked? I know, and have known many people who are affected by mental health conditions, and none of them are the result of a head injury, (or poor parenting for that matter).
Mental illness is not induced by poor parenting or head injuries you total numpty, you have no right to stand there and spout your rubbish to a fawning crowd (a very tiny crown as it happens), and suggesting that mental illness is a direct result of upbringing or a blow to the head will set back the public understanding of many conditions years, maybe to the same era as most of the other thoughts put forward by the local politicians originate from, so at least you're consistent, consistently wrong, but consistent all the same.
They say it's better to keep your mouth shut and let people think that you're out of touch, than to open it and prove them right.
ICBM
Another ill informed performance, from Timbo, and further example how he likes to appear to be an authority on everything, when the only thing he is proficient in, is talking "bollocks" fluently.
 |
| Nice chins Timmy. |
As we have already seen from his previous claims, ...
Probably the most offensive part of his speech, was his claim about supporting lots of local mental health charities, like Worthing Mind, who told me that they never see him, and he only turns up if there's a press photographer in attendance. He also included "headway" in this part of his speech. Now although headway are a brilliant charity, they are neither local to Worthing, or a mental health charity. Headway do a fantastic job, but that job relates to acquired brain injuries, not mental health conditions. Is Timbo suggesting that the two are somehow linked? I know, and have known many people who are affected by mental health conditions, and none of them are the result of a head injury, (or poor parenting for that matter).
Mental illness is not induced by poor parenting or head injuries you total numpty, you have no right to stand there and spout your rubbish to a fawning crowd (a very tiny crown as it happens), and suggesting that mental illness is a direct result of upbringing or a blow to the head will set back the public understanding of many conditions years, maybe to the same era as most of the other thoughts put forward by the local politicians originate from, so at least you're consistent, consistently wrong, but consistent all the same.
They say it's better to keep your mouth shut and let people think that you're out of touch, than to open it and prove them right.
ICBM
Monday, 7 October 2013
Worthing Mental Health Awareness Weak?
Yes it is. How dare I question the mental health awareness gurus of Worthing, any issues that are not positive are deemed by them to be "cornering" someone. Well, if you don't have an answer to a simple question then that's not my problem, you've only got yourself to blame.
As we've already seen, Best of Worthing only publicises happy stuff,
they're not interested in the truth about mental health issues and are clearly just pretending in order to boost their pathetic business. We have a word for people like that round here, they're called leeches.
Here's their chief and her views on freedom of truth regarding mental illness:
What a surprise, this appears to be the same woman who regularly attends the freebie events with the Worthing Mayor.
Infectious you say? yes you certainly are, just like herpes you ignorant idiot, and it's tenacious not tinacious stupid.
"Today was about mental health" was it? Not about publicity then, because that's what it looks like to me. You were fully aware that Tim Loughton had published some clearly misleading sh*t via his lobbying group, yet still believed that the publicity he would bring was more important than actually educating people about mental health issues.
Just to remind you, this is what he claimed:
Poor parenting is not the cause of most of the recognised mental disorders, not even the majority of them, not even a minority either, in fact it is very unlikely to be a cause of any mental disorder unless you stand to make some cash selling recycled, previously dismissed psychological theories in a repackaged form, which strangely this organisation is doing.
If you believe that this event was anything to do with helping people with mental health issues then you're dumber than you look. It's nice that you want to stand up for your freebie delivering mate, but if someone puts publicity above cause, they deserve a few tricky questions, and getting all self righteous about it doesn't impress anyone that actually matters.
Worthing Mental Health Week lost all of it's credibility when it decided to arrange for an abusive hater of all people with mental health conditions to open it, despite being aware of his leanings before hand, but favouring publicity over integrity.
Maybe, as Loughton described me, I am a "well known local nutter", better that than an ignorant self promoting twat. Maybe I'm a little old fashioned, but my credibility cannot be bought for a few shiny buttons, and people who sell theirs so easily in exchange for a few column inches are about as valuable as the magick beans that they crave so greatly.
I hope one day that you suffer the mental torture that Adur and Worthing councils, their MP and other political allies, have dealt out to myself and my family, I hope that you endure with a smile the beatings and death threats sent your way in good faith and don't take them all personally like we did, and when you've suffered enough I'll be sure to send you an Asda "mental patient" costume as a get well soon present.
It wasn't about mental health, it was about pointless self promotion, if you believe that it was you are sadly deluded.
TTFO
K
As we've already seen, Best of Worthing only publicises happy stuff,
they're not interested in the truth about mental health issues and are clearly just pretending in order to boost their pathetic business. We have a word for people like that round here, they're called leeches.
Here's their chief and her views on freedom of truth regarding mental illness:
Infectious you say? yes you certainly are, just like herpes you ignorant idiot, and it's tenacious not tinacious stupid.
"Today was about mental health" was it? Not about publicity then, because that's what it looks like to me. You were fully aware that Tim Loughton had published some clearly misleading sh*t via his lobbying group, yet still believed that the publicity he would bring was more important than actually educating people about mental health issues.
Just to remind you, this is what he claimed:
Poor parenting is not the cause of most of the recognised mental disorders, not even the majority of them, not even a minority either, in fact it is very unlikely to be a cause of any mental disorder unless you stand to make some cash selling recycled, previously dismissed psychological theories in a repackaged form, which strangely this organisation is doing.
If you believe that this event was anything to do with helping people with mental health issues then you're dumber than you look. It's nice that you want to stand up for your freebie delivering mate, but if someone puts publicity above cause, they deserve a few tricky questions, and getting all self righteous about it doesn't impress anyone that actually matters.
Worthing Mental Health Week lost all of it's credibility when it decided to arrange for an abusive hater of all people with mental health conditions to open it, despite being aware of his leanings before hand, but favouring publicity over integrity.
Maybe, as Loughton described me, I am a "well known local nutter", better that than an ignorant self promoting twat. Maybe I'm a little old fashioned, but my credibility cannot be bought for a few shiny buttons, and people who sell theirs so easily in exchange for a few column inches are about as valuable as the magick beans that they crave so greatly.
I hope one day that you suffer the mental torture that Adur and Worthing councils, their MP and other political allies, have dealt out to myself and my family, I hope that you endure with a smile the beatings and death threats sent your way in good faith and don't take them all personally like we did, and when you've suffered enough I'll be sure to send you an Asda "mental patient" costume as a get well soon present.
It wasn't about mental health, it was about pointless self promotion, if you believe that it was you are sadly deluded.
TTFO
K
Worthing Mental Health Awareness Week
So they claim anyway, they don't actually seem that interested in mental health at all, it looks to me like it's just another political backslapping exercise by the local Dim Libs and Tory Scum. No change there then, let's pretend we're helping those worse off than ourselves by demeaning them and getting our ugly potato faces all over the local rag.
Spelling mistakes aside, what a load of old cobblers this is.
Opened by Tim Loughton, remember him, he used to be a minister, now he's just a bitter, twisted, vengeful liar. Yes, Worthing mental health awareness week is opened by the man who publicly called me a "well known local nutter". The man who claimed that Autism was a mental illness, and that this and all "other" mental conditions were caused solely by poor parenting. Why would he make such an ill informed claim? Simple, he's making a profit by spouting this kind of crap through his "Mindless Policy Group". Obviously the ideal person to open such an awareness event.
Who else is attending, Oh yes the local police inspector. Would that possibly be the same one in charge of the team of animals who beat me to a pulp and then left me for 8 hours in a cell with no medical attention? Yes, the very same, he is clearly a paragon of caring isn't he.
What happens when you raise concerns, as a service user with the organiser? You get this.....
Yes, this is not about mental health at all, it's clearly just a "good stuff" kind of event, because all mental health conditions are good, happy and wholesome. Mental health conditions are not happy, they are f*cking horrible, and a stupid little back slapping exercise in a backstreet church in Worthing will do absolutely f*ck all to change that, all it will do is get some extra column inches for some sad old politicos who are about as as clued up as they are charismatic.
If you want people to be aware of MH issues, eating cake and clapping like a trained seal at someone giving a shit purely for publicity purposes, just won't do it.
Explaining MH issues honestly in a public forum won't result in the clapping of hands, and a slice of cake from Asda who made their views pretty clear on how they view "mental patients", is more than likely to stick in the throat of anyone who actually knows anything about MH conditions. Asda can shove their cake up their bottoms and so can all the sanctimonious turds who think that a weeks publicity in a crappy little church hall, will make a jot of difference in the real world.
An event that is supposed to help sufferers of MH conditions should be making people aware of the problems involved not as a publicity stunt for failing politicians. The fact that Timbo the Ignorant is presiding and the refreshments are provided by Asda has meant that I won't be attending, and neither will any of my local support group of fellow sufferers. You can shove your monkey show up your arses and f*ck off while you're doing it. If you want to understand MH conditions, lock yourself in a dark room for a week, and you'll begin to get a taste of what it's like, you patronising b*stards.
Take care out there, it's full of cockwombles.
K
Opened by Tim Loughton, remember him, he used to be a minister, now he's just a bitter, twisted, vengeful liar. Yes, Worthing mental health awareness week is opened by the man who publicly called me a "well known local nutter". The man who claimed that Autism was a mental illness, and that this and all "other" mental conditions were caused solely by poor parenting. Why would he make such an ill informed claim? Simple, he's making a profit by spouting this kind of crap through his "Mindless Policy Group". Obviously the ideal person to open such an awareness event.
Who else is attending, Oh yes the local police inspector. Would that possibly be the same one in charge of the team of animals who beat me to a pulp and then left me for 8 hours in a cell with no medical attention? Yes, the very same, he is clearly a paragon of caring isn't he.
What happens when you raise concerns, as a service user with the organiser? You get this.....
Yes, this is not about mental health at all, it's clearly just a "good stuff" kind of event, because all mental health conditions are good, happy and wholesome. Mental health conditions are not happy, they are f*cking horrible, and a stupid little back slapping exercise in a backstreet church in Worthing will do absolutely f*ck all to change that, all it will do is get some extra column inches for some sad old politicos who are about as as clued up as they are charismatic.
If you want people to be aware of MH issues, eating cake and clapping like a trained seal at someone giving a shit purely for publicity purposes, just won't do it.
Explaining MH issues honestly in a public forum won't result in the clapping of hands, and a slice of cake from Asda who made their views pretty clear on how they view "mental patients", is more than likely to stick in the throat of anyone who actually knows anything about MH conditions. Asda can shove their cake up their bottoms and so can all the sanctimonious turds who think that a weeks publicity in a crappy little church hall, will make a jot of difference in the real world.
An event that is supposed to help sufferers of MH conditions should be making people aware of the problems involved not as a publicity stunt for failing politicians. The fact that Timbo the Ignorant is presiding and the refreshments are provided by Asda has meant that I won't be attending, and neither will any of my local support group of fellow sufferers. You can shove your monkey show up your arses and f*ck off while you're doing it. If you want to understand MH conditions, lock yourself in a dark room for a week, and you'll begin to get a taste of what it's like, you patronising b*stards.
Take care out there, it's full of cockwombles.
K
Sunday, 6 October 2013
Shoreham is overrun with swingers!
Now that I've got your attention, although there are plenty of stories about "Swap 'em Beach" residents, this post is actually about this story in the Harald.
Yes, the "Scientology Shoreham" event was last week, and the news has now reached the people of Shoreham via the Harald.
And what a load of cobblers this "story" really is. Myself and the family were in town last Sunday and passed the community centre while this event was in full swing (excuse the pun), although I think that we must have seen a completely different event, because the report seems a little lacking in facts.
Here it is:
Well, he definitely put on a show never seen in Shoreham, because no bugger saw it, the claim of a 160 strong audience is a bit of a push to be honest. Maybe there was 160 people in attendance, if you include the staff of the three catering companies that were wasting their time outside the venue, all the members of the bands, their crew, hangers on (random filthy scientologists), and the various undignitaries provided with freebies, but there were still parking spaces outside the venue, and having worked in this field myself, I know that you can tell from outside a building if the hall being played to is empty or full, and this one had a clear sound of rattling an empty room.
As for the money raised, £2500 sounds like a nice round figure (insert Mendoza is fat joke here to taste), but if you take the 160 attendees as a fact (ha ha ha), and allow for 10% on the door sales, you come up to £2480. What about hall hire, PA and lighting hire, crew, advertising, printing of full colour, card stock, A5 flyers by the thousand? None of that is cheap I know, and even if you are organising a charity event, businesses won't give it all for free, the best you can usually hope for is, at cost mates rates in exchange for free advertising.
It's bloody lucky that the Sea Org Aces waived their fee, as we have seen what this is in previous council accounts disclosures;
if they hadn't, this charity event would have raised a loss of more than £3k, but for the Jive Arses, this was not about charity, it was a recruitment drive for their filthy cult, and the distribution of their vile propaganda, that we have spotted (and might have removed/hidden/turned away from sight), in swathes around Shoreham since last Sunday. If you see any that may have been missed remember to leave it exactly where it is, and at no cost should you sneak the lot under your coat and relocate it to the nearest recycling bin. "Say no to Drugs" is not an anti drugs campaign, it is a pro scientology campaign and if you read any of this sh*t you should notice that there are no suggestions anywhere in it, regarding treatments or any other useful information whatsoever, they seem to want to claim that taking paracetamol leads to crack addiction, which is, of course total crap, but so is the rest of their stupid pseudo religious, spaceman bullsh*t.
Enjoy your Sunday, and remember
Keep watching the skiers,
(that joke would work better if ski sunday still existed)
K
 |
| Mendoza's "jump jive" reportedly triggers seismic event. |
Yes, the "Scientology Shoreham" event was last week, and the news has now reached the people of Shoreham via the Harald.
And what a load of cobblers this "story" really is. Myself and the family were in town last Sunday and passed the community centre while this event was in full swing (excuse the pun), although I think that we must have seen a completely different event, because the report seems a little lacking in facts.
Here it is:
As for the money raised, £2500 sounds like a nice round figure (insert Mendoza is fat joke here to taste), but if you take the 160 attendees as a fact (ha ha ha), and allow for 10% on the door sales, you come up to £2480. What about hall hire, PA and lighting hire, crew, advertising, printing of full colour, card stock, A5 flyers by the thousand? None of that is cheap I know, and even if you are organising a charity event, businesses won't give it all for free, the best you can usually hope for is, at cost mates rates in exchange for free advertising.
It's bloody lucky that the Sea Org Aces waived their fee, as we have seen what this is in previous council accounts disclosures;
Enjoy your Sunday, and remember
Keep watching the skiers,
(that joke would work better if ski sunday still existed)
K
Thursday, 3 October 2013
Osborne's new plans for the unemployed.
I know this is not a local issue, but hey, I like to branch out once in a while.
I have been breaking the rules again, I listened to the words of a politician and applied logic to them, this never ends well, does it?
The new ways to "reward hard working people" from the Tories looks to be another really stupid plan, designed to cripple the DWP and NHS and so pass the matter into private hands.
I write, in relation to this story.
So, if they are going to make people sign on every day instead of every fortnight, this will increase the workload of job centre FoH staff by up to 14 times, and if people are expected to stay all day, you can multiply that by the number of signings they deal with every day. Each job centre could potentially have hundreds if not thousands of visitors every day. Most of the job centre buildings could simply not cope with that number due to fire safety and insurance conditions alone. That's before the extra pressure loaded onto the staff with the increased workload, which is already at breaking point, would staff sickness or god forbid, a strike, result in all the people queuing outside being penalised?
There is also the travelling expense issue, anyone living in Shoreham who would be required to attend Worthing Job Centre every day, would be looking at a 7 quid a day bus ticket, that would put them £35 a week down before they start. Although I seem to recall a rule in place that suggested that if someone lives more than four miles from a Job Centre they could not be forced to attend more than once a week, but I expect that rule will disappear pretty quickly along with all the other laws there to protect us from exploitation.
As for the "community service" element, are they planning on making unemployment a crime now? If people are working they should be paid minimum wage at the very least, if they are being paid benefits they should only be required to work the equal amount of hours that, at minimum wage, make up that benefit, not a fixed 30 hours a week anything else would be technically illegal.
Let's look at this part in some detail:
These "intensive programmes" that deal with addictions and mental health issues, will they be provided by ATOS by any chance? or maybe another private provider, because the NHS definitely won't be able to provide this service, they just don't have the resources.
Are we to expect some kind of internment camps for addicts and the mentally ill, would these be a combined venue, because it appears to be claimed that they are similar. I'm not sure how the effects of mental health conditions can be "dealt with" intensively, the same goes for serious long term addiction, there are no miracle five minute cures, no matter what some private companies operating to a cost rather than a standard might claim.
Is there to be an intensive programme to cure physical injuries and disabilities too? Can Gideon cure a broken leg in a week or miraculously heal the sick and dying, he's not Jesus you know, no matter how much he seems to think that he is. Maybe he could prove this to us, one way or the other, by taking a long walk off a short pier quite literally.
Another extremely badly thought out plan by the Tories that no doubt will be put into practice with equal thought and execution. Maybe execution will be their next plan, they seem to want to support the Daily Mail's historical connection with the Nazi Party, and claim that it's nothing more than being "Raucous".
Twats, one and all.
K
I have been breaking the rules again, I listened to the words of a politician and applied logic to them, this never ends well, does it?
The new ways to "reward hard working people" from the Tories looks to be another really stupid plan, designed to cripple the DWP and NHS and so pass the matter into private hands.
I write, in relation to this story.
So, if they are going to make people sign on every day instead of every fortnight, this will increase the workload of job centre FoH staff by up to 14 times, and if people are expected to stay all day, you can multiply that by the number of signings they deal with every day. Each job centre could potentially have hundreds if not thousands of visitors every day. Most of the job centre buildings could simply not cope with that number due to fire safety and insurance conditions alone. That's before the extra pressure loaded onto the staff with the increased workload, which is already at breaking point, would staff sickness or god forbid, a strike, result in all the people queuing outside being penalised?
There is also the travelling expense issue, anyone living in Shoreham who would be required to attend Worthing Job Centre every day, would be looking at a 7 quid a day bus ticket, that would put them £35 a week down before they start. Although I seem to recall a rule in place that suggested that if someone lives more than four miles from a Job Centre they could not be forced to attend more than once a week, but I expect that rule will disappear pretty quickly along with all the other laws there to protect us from exploitation.
As for the "community service" element, are they planning on making unemployment a crime now? If people are working they should be paid minimum wage at the very least, if they are being paid benefits they should only be required to work the equal amount of hours that, at minimum wage, make up that benefit, not a fixed 30 hours a week anything else would be technically illegal.
Let's look at this part in some detail:
Are we to expect some kind of internment camps for addicts and the mentally ill, would these be a combined venue, because it appears to be claimed that they are similar. I'm not sure how the effects of mental health conditions can be "dealt with" intensively, the same goes for serious long term addiction, there are no miracle five minute cures, no matter what some private companies operating to a cost rather than a standard might claim.
Is there to be an intensive programme to cure physical injuries and disabilities too? Can Gideon cure a broken leg in a week or miraculously heal the sick and dying, he's not Jesus you know, no matter how much he seems to think that he is. Maybe he could prove this to us, one way or the other, by taking a long walk off a short pier quite literally.
Another extremely badly thought out plan by the Tories that no doubt will be put into practice with equal thought and execution. Maybe execution will be their next plan, they seem to want to support the Daily Mail's historical connection with the Nazi Party, and claim that it's nothing more than being "Raucous".
Twats, one and all.
K
Tuesday, 1 October 2013
Blacklisters welcomed with open arms.
It would appear that the Tory party just adore blacklists, they can't get enough of them apparently.
Tim Loughton is especially fond of using blacklists and so shares a common interest with Carillion, not to be confused with the prog rock band of a similar name, who I have been advised do not operate a blacklist at all.
After Carillion were banned from the Labour Party conference because of this small matter, the Tories welcomed them with open arms, and first in line at the welcoming committee was our local MP Tory Tim, not nice and dim.
We already know that Timbo just loves blacklists, he can't get enough of them, especially the illegally operated ones, they're his favourite.
As you can see from the photo, Timmy is sticking two fingers up at freedom and asserting his position as chief freebie hunter in order to seek some pointless self-promotion and possibly a bit of lobbying work on the side.
Looks like Manchester has installed a "shit magnet" this week, as they seem to be attracting all kinds of undesirables.
ATAB
K
Tim Loughton is especially fond of using blacklists and so shares a common interest with Carillion, not to be confused with the prog rock band of a similar name, who I have been advised do not operate a blacklist at all.
After Carillion were banned from the Labour Party conference because of this small matter, the Tories welcomed them with open arms, and first in line at the welcoming committee was our local MP Tory Tim, not nice and dim.
We already know that Timbo just loves blacklists, he can't get enough of them, especially the illegally operated ones, they're his favourite.
As you can see from the photo, Timmy is sticking two fingers up at freedom and asserting his position as chief freebie hunter in order to seek some pointless self-promotion and possibly a bit of lobbying work on the side.
Looks like Manchester has installed a "shit magnet" this week, as they seem to be attracting all kinds of undesirables.
ATAB
K
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)